By Plenary Sessions: Arvo Aller
Total Sessions: 141
Fully Profiled: 141
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker is vehemently opposed to the introduction of new EU taxes, viewing this as both a loss of sovereignty and a reduction in member states' tax revenues. They advocate for supporting agriculture to guarantee food security and criticize taxes (such as usufruct fees and land taxes) that complicate farming operations. The preference is for national fiscal control and subsidies directed toward primary sectors.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Economic perspectives emphasize fiscal transparency and accountability. The speaker criticizes the government's budgetary accounting, particularly the failure to include depreciation, suspecting this is motivated by a desire to present a smaller budget deficit to the European Union. He prefers strict and honest numerical reporting.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Economic perspectives emphasize fiscal transparency and accurate accounting of state expenditures. The speaker is concerned about the general government sector balance (–4.5%) and suspects the budget deficit has been underestimated due to the exclusion of non-cash expenditures.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The economic platform focuses on supporting producers and residents in rural areas, while strongly opposing tax hikes (such as the car tax, income tax, and VAT) and cuts to agricultural subsidies. They advocate for local food production and procurement in schools and kindergartens, standing firmly against centralized joint procurement schemes. Furthermore, they criticize the increase in bureaucracy, which prevents farmers from accessing investment grants.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Insufficient Data.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
Insufficient information
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
His economic views are strongly opposed to tax hikes, especially concerning agricultural land, as this directly impacts the cost price of agricultural production. He criticizes the state policy that forces local governments to raise taxes and calls for national support for farmers to guarantee food security. He views lowering the land tax at the local government level as a positive solution.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The speaker is skeptical of the government's promise to cut bureaucracy, since the bill currently under discussion amends 98 laws. No direct positions on taxes, trade, or economic growth are presented.
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
Economic perspectives focus on fiscal responsibility and the inefficient management of resources within the defense sector. Emphasis is placed on the contradiction between acquiring expensive military technology and having an empty budget/stockpile ("the pantry is empty"), which points to concerns regarding the imbalance of state finances.
2025-09-08
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The speaker supports subsidizing small producers, viewing the grants as significant motivation and additional income, even when the subsidy amounts are marginal. He/She acknowledges that operating as a sole proprietor (FIE) or a private limited company (OÜ) generates tax revenue for the state, but criticizes cuts that harm small operators. Furthermore, he/she points out the immediate deduction of income tax from grants given to private individuals.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
Economic perspectives are critical of the government's tax increases (car tax, VAT, excise duties, state fees), demanding clarification regarding their impact on the revenue base of local governments. They support increasing the financial autonomy of local governments and oppose budget cuts for state institutions (courts).
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The speaker criticizes taxes that raise consumer prices (such as VAT) and deems the increase in the income tax-free minimum insufficient, arguing that it does not offset previous price hikes. They support boosting economic growth and improving competitiveness, and stress the necessity of prioritizing local labor (given the 60,000 unemployed) over importing foreign workers.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
The economic stance is strongly fiscally conservative, opposing any fee increases that undermine people's ability to cope and make them "even more poorer." There is also criticism directed at the growth of bureaucracy and administrative costs resulting from the introduction of new IT solutions and the hiring of specialists, all funded at the expense of waste management.
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
There are no specific economic views, but there is strong opposition to widespread financial dishonesty and the theft of funds, exemplified by the 6 million euro sum in the Lehtme case. This indicates concern over the misappropriation of state funds or donations.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
Economic views are strongly pro-tax cuts, based on the belief that this keeps money circulating and increases budget revenue (a policy tested in 2020). It sharply opposes all tax hikes (including VAT, excise duties, car tax, and land tax), deeming them ineffective and harmful to the public's standard of living. The preference is to increase the disposable income of working people to stimulate consumption and economic growth.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The economic stance is strongly pro-business, calling for a reduction in taxes (labor taxes, VAT, excises, and income tax) to enhance the operational capacity of companies. The introduction of cheap labor is viewed as detrimental to the economy, failing to boost productivity, and distorting the local labor market.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
He supports lowering energy prices by removing the CO2 component and criticizes the electricity exchange system, which, in his estimation, serves quota traders rather than producers. He emphasizes the protection of private property value and demands fair compensation from the state if nature conservation restrictions significantly reduce the value of the land.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
Economic views are strictly tied to the fight against corruption and financial crimes. Personal financial responsibility (the filing of a personal financial claim) is demanded in connection with the 6 million euros allegedly stolen through the Slava Ukraini organization.
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The economic arguments are implicit, focusing on the concern that the reduction of budgetary resources is the main driver for closing regional courthouses. The speaker suggests that the lack of money and staff in the budget is merely a pretext for consolidating services.
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
Insufficient data.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Economic views strongly favor tax reductions, seeing the lowering of excise duties and VAT as a means to reduce food prices and support entrepreneurship. The speaker is convinced that high taxation ("taxing your way to wealth") is ineffective and prevents the country from becoming richer. They support a fiscal policy that promotes favorable prices for consumers.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Economic perspectives stress the importance of fiscal transparency and accountability concerning major public investments. The speaker is demanding a clear clarification on whether the 2.6 billion euros should be classified as a revenue or expenditure line item, highlighting the necessity of strict financial discipline.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Economic perspectives are strongly opposed to tax hikes, specifically criticizing the increases in car tax, fuel excise duty, VAT, and land tax, all of which diminish the purchasing power of rural residents. The speaker stresses that high input costs and taxes will result in the closure of local services and shops, effectively making it possible to get by in rural areas only for the wealthy.
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Economic perspectives are leaning towards reducing regulations, supporting the elimination of CO2 quotas. These quotas are tied to stock market issues and investment portfolios, indicating a desire to ease the regulatory burden for the benefit of the economy.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The speaker strongly opposes the government minister’s statement regarding higher taxation of the wealthy or the demand for a social tax levy, viewing this as creating a state-destructive disparity. This position emphasizes social unity and stands in opposition to the government’s proposed ideas for redistribution.
2025-04-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
Economic viewpoints strongly advocate for tax reductions, particularly concerning the VAT on foodstuffs, in order to ease the financial burden on consumers and stimulate small businesses in rural areas. Tax hikes (excise duties, income tax, and VAT) are viewed as detrimental to the economy, leading to even higher food prices. Support is given to improving the competitiveness of domestic producers.
2025-04-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The prevailing economic perspective stresses the importance of maintaining tax revenue and protecting the existing oil shale industry, thereby opposing any phase-out of oil shale. The objectives include ensuring competitiveness and establishing a subsidy-free electricity market. Furthermore, warnings are raised regarding the economic repercussions of making decisions without conducting a prior impact assessment.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
Economic views highlight criticism concerning government overhead spending, specifically questioning the necessity and practical value of the new position—that of an events organizer—from the average taxpayer's perspective.
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Economic considerations center on protecting the interests of the fishing industry and professional fishermen against a direct reduction in output. The damage is quantified (30 tons of fish per day), underscoring the necessity of regulating nature to safeguard economic interests and businesses.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
There is no data available regarding economic views, taxes, spending, or regulations.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker is a strong advocate for economic growth and improving public welfare, viewing these as top priorities. He is skeptical of regulations (such as gender quotas) that fail to demonstrate direct economic stimulation, criticizing their presentation as indicators of economic growth.
2025-03-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-03-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The text expresses concern regarding the increased administrative costs and workload imposed on businesses resulting from new regulations (such as sanctions compliance). It supports the objective of reducing bureaucracy but criticizes measures that actively undermine this goal. It highlights concern over the regulatory burden placed on the business environment.
2025-03-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
Economic perspectives emphasize a market-based approach and fiscal discipline within the energy sector. The speaker advocates for abolishing renewable energy subsidies, arguing that producers should stand on their own two feet, and criticizes the hidden costs that are ultimately borne by the consumer.
2025-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2025-03-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session
The economic views concern labor regulation, where the speaker opposes any further easing of the Aliens Act. He argues that current rules already permit bringing a sufficient number of highly paid skilled workers into Estonia without quotas, thereby indicating the adequate flexibility of existing regulations.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The economic perspectives address the VAT exemption for media, pointing out that this concession also applies to Russian media outlets. However, a clear stance on broader tax policy, fiscal discipline, or economic growth objectives has not been put forward.
2025-02-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Economic perspectives emphasize the transparency of state finances and responsible spending. The speaker criticizes the allocation of 2.6 billion euros based on unreliable data and demands genuine awareness of short-term energy market risks.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, press briefing
Economic views emphasize fiscal prudence, contrasting with the high cost of the green transition and deeming it too expensive for Estonia ('it is not affordable for us'). Criticism is also directed at the allocation of 2.6 billion euros, suggesting its inefficient use for energy production purposes.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is insufficient data. The speaker mentions that stateless persons have a constitutional right to work, but economic policy, taxation, or budget discipline are not addressed.
2025-02-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session.
The speaker supports increasing public spending on sports, coaches, and youth camps to ensure children remain active. However, he/she expresses concern that if business activities are "choked off," profits will fall and the contribution of private funding to sports will decrease, which is dangerous.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is no data available regarding economic standpoints.
2025-02-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
Economic views emphasize fiscal responsibility and demand that the benefits derived from investments reach the Estonian people directly. The speaker is skeptical of large promised returns when the distribution of benefits is unclear and there is suspicion of unjust enrichment by ideologically driven companies.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Economic views emphasize a market-economy approach, standing in strong opposition to the €2.6 billion in state subsidies allocated to the energy sector. The speaker questions the rationale for subsidization when the energy is allegedly cheap, pointing to inefficient state spending.
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Economic perspectives stress the necessity for tighter regulation in the labor market to prevent the exploitation of temporary workers and curb unfair competition. A specific concern highlighted is that agency workers in Estonia can perform "any job whatsoever" without adequate oversight, indicating a clear desire to protect existing labor standards.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
Economic views support tax cuts (VAT, excise duties) aimed at improving consumers’ purchasing power and their ability to cope. Critical of the government, which prioritizes fiscal discipline and budget revenue over the economic well-being of the people.
2025-01-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Economic positions emphasize protecting the interests of agricultural businesses from excessive regulation and bureaucracy. There is opposition to social conditionality requirements, which increase the administrative burden and introduce the risk of reducing subsidies for minor deficiencies. Furthermore, the unequal competitive situation between businesses and private individuals applying for support is also criticized.
2025-01-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Economic views focus on fiscal responsibility and the fair utilization of taxpayer money. The speaker strongly opposes the lack of transparency regarding expense reimbursements for public servants and unreasonable bonuses, which infringe upon the principle of integrity.
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Economic perspectives prioritize regional stability and security over budget cuts. The government's fiscal policy is being criticized because it can find 100 million euros elsewhere, but is unable to find 682,000 euros for a courthouse. Concern is also being expressed regarding rising fuel excise duties, the car tax, and the condition of the roads, all of which make it harder for both residents and local municipalities to make ends meet.
2024-12-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Economic perspectives are zeroing in on the practical aspects of tax policy, confirming that the wage tax is coming into effect. This demonstrates an awareness of the impact of fiscal measures and how they will be implemented.
2024-12-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Economic positions emphasize the need to reduce the administrative burden and bureaucracy faced by agricultural producers. There is opposition to regulations that result in the automatic reduction of subsidies and the clawback of small amounts (up to 100 euros), thereby protecting producers' financial interests and stability.
2024-12-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker is strongly pro-business, emphasizing the need for economic certainty and the protection of investments. He criticizes regulations that create a more difficult environment for entrepreneurs, halt necessary procedures, and shift costs (such as environmental impact assessments) onto the businesses themselves. He is concerned about the preservation of industry and jobs, particularly within the oil shale sector.
2024-12-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.
Economic positions are indirect; the development of wind farms is viewed negatively if it jeopardizes national defense and the welfare of residents, regardless of their capacity to generate electricity. There are no direct stances on taxes, trade, or fiscal discipline, as the focus is on prioritizing security over economic development.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker opposes the introduction of the new security tax, arguing that it restricts and stifles entrepreneurship. He criticizes the government for its failure to collect existing taxes effectively and questions how sole proprietors (FIEs) would be able to contribute to security.
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Not enough data
2024-12-02
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The economic outlook supports entrepreneurship, stressing the need for stable conditions and timely decisions within the agricultural sector. We support the state receiving a fair price at auction, but we criticize the delays that complicate the preparation and investment decisions of entrepreneurs (including Tartu Agro and other bidders).
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data
2024-11-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session.
There is not enough data.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
Strongly opposed to tax increases and new taxes (motor vehicle tax), viewing them as a burden on the working population. It criticizes the austerity budget, which eliminates the principle of regional balance and worsens the accessibility of services. Skeptical regarding the Just Transition Fund, as it fails to compensate for the job losses in the oil shale sector.
2024-11-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Economic views are tied to protecting industry and regional resources, standing in opposition to administrative decisions that might lead to industrial closures. He considers it illogical to place land management operations under a ministry responsible for industry, especially when that industry is being shut down. The preferred approach is to manage mineral resources and planning under a ministry that handles regional policy and the actual resource users (farmers, foresters).
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Economic perspectives emphasize the well-being and efficiency of the workforce, asserting that rest and spending time with family significantly improve work performance. There is strong opposition to the coalition's proposed tax increases, particularly when they are introduced without a proper impact assessment. Support is given to increasing the leisure time available to working people, even at the cost of foregoing state revenue.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Economic views are critical of the car tax, arguing that it neither increases the wealth of the Estonian people nor improves their livelihood. Emphasis is placed on the need to reduce regional inequality, which calls into question the positive impact of the current tax policy.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
Economic views stress fiscal discipline and transparency concerning major state investments (like Rail Baltic), demanding an exact financial and percentage overview of Estonia's contribution. Regulatory relief is supported via the reduction of bureaucracy.
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker is critical of the economic policy that stifles competitiveness and leads to job losses (specifically in the oil shale sector). He supports measures that foster economic growth, citing the previous reduction of excise duties as a positive example. Furthermore, he opposes the increase in land tax, which disproportionately burdens agricultural producers, and criticizes the bureaucracy that prevents farmers from accessing agricultural subsidies.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
Economic considerations are indirectly evident in the criticism directed at the International Labour Organization convention, as it obligates employers to address social gender issues and conduct extensive multilingual awareness campaigns. These obligations are viewed as rather burdensome and unreasonable, and are not necessary for Estonia.
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Economic views emphasize the fairness of taxation, calling into question the prioritization of banks over the general public during unfavorable market conditions. The speaker supports the position that banks' extraordinary profits should be taxable, even if this creates uncertainty.
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker is concerned about the decline of the Estonian economy and sharply criticizes the VAT increase, stressing that this constitutes a 10% rise, not 2%. He emphasizes the need to restore export competitiveness and inquires about the probability of the Scandinavian markets recovering, thereby highlighting his concern regarding economic growth and exports.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Economic views emphasize budget transparency and fiscal discipline, demanding clear accounting for the financing of major projects (such as Rail Baltic). The precision of tax legislation is crucial to clearly define who qualifies as a taxpayer and how various business forms are treated.
2024-10-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
There is not enough data.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
Economic considerations are linked to the management of labor regulations and benefits, focusing specifically on the accounting of health promotion costs. The necessity of clear rules is emphasized to prevent ambiguity for both employees (concerning the potential for double utilization) and employers.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
Economic analysts are critical of the government's budgetary reallocations, arguing that they fail to deliver genuine savings and instead result in a net increase in positions across ministries. Furthermore, there is opposition to new taxation measures (specifically, the rise in specialist doctor visit fees) which directly impact the most vulnerable segments of the population.
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
Supports economic growth through infrastructure investments, especially to support business in Ida-Virumaa, ensuring better access to the Narva plant. It considers private sector financing (PPP) a crucial tool for accelerating large road projects (Via Baltica) and funding road construction.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
Strongly supports reducing the tax burden for primary producers (lowering VAT on fruits and vegetables) and the financing of local governments. It criticizes the government’s expenditure on administrative activities and soft measures (JTF), deeming them wasteful. It argues that the state assigns responsibilities to local municipalities (KOVs) without providing the necessary funding, thereby increasing their burden.
2024-09-24
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
Economic views emphasize the simplification of the tax system and the reduction of bureaucracy, supporting, for example, raising the VAT registration threshold above 40,000 euros. The speaker seeks clarity regarding the tax rates for the business account and advocates for efficient solutions when transferring financial assets.
2024-09-23
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
There is too little data.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
Not enough data. (The acceleration of renewable energy adoption and waste management are addressed, but there are no positions regarding taxes, budgetary discipline, or economic growth.)
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
No data available.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
Strongly supports the interests and confidence of entrepreneurs, opposing the regulation that halts permit processing and creates uncertainty. It demands that the government compensate the costs incurred by entrepreneurs who have already begun environmental impact assessments. It criticizes the government's actions, which damage the regional economy and employment, and inquires about the Environmental Board's cutback plans.
2024-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The economic arguments are implicit, hinting at criticism concerning the relationship between school closures and funding, and ironically questioning whether closing more schools will actually result in additional money. The speaker opposes cuts that diminish the regional education infrastructure, prioritizing the preservation of local services.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
There is not enough data.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
Economic perspectives are strongly opposed to tax hikes, especially given the three-year-long economic downturn. The argument is that tax increases won't actually boost state revenues, but will instead encourage people to use their ingenuity to optimize their incomes. The government's policy is being described as "taxing people into poverty."
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
The economic stance strongly opposes tax increases, particularly the rise in VAT, arguing that it is reflected in consumer prices and disproportionately affects lower-income individuals. It advocates for a fiscal policy that ensures citizens have sufficient funds to purchase food. Criticism is directed at the comprehensive tax package, which encompasses income tax, VAT, a car tax, and a sugar tax.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
It expresses strong opposition to the introduction of the new tax obligation (the car tax), emphasizing that while money is needed, this does not justify taking measures that contravene the constitution. The economic viewpoints are framed primarily as legal and procedural criticism.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The economic views expressed are strongly opposed to tax hikes, emphasizing that government levies and land tax directly hit people's pockets. Concern is raised regarding the competitiveness of the agricultural sector, as the increase in land tax drives up rental prices. It is suspected that the revenue collected from state fees is not directly used to cover the costs of the relevant procedures, but instead goes toward plugging holes in the state budget.
2024-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
It supports the principle that money should be taken from where it is available, and criticizes policies that impose retroactive taxation (like the car tax) or drain funds from areas that desperately need investment. It strongly emphasizes the necessity of economic growth, in stark contrast to the government-induced recession.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Economic views are strongly opposed to tax increases, especially concerning the car tax, which is deemed an unfair wealth tax. Warnings are issued that raising taxes (including the sugar tax, VAT, income tax, and excises/duties) will increase people's costs and diminish their purchasing power, ultimately leading to reduced consumption.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Not enough data
2024-06-04
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting
The economic views expressed are strongly opposed to tax increases, especially concerning the abolition of the income tax exemption on pensions. It is emphasized that tax hikes (VAT, excise duties, income tax) increase poverty and directly hit the wallets of those in the most difficult circumstances. Social protection is supported, and there is opposition to fiscal policies that worsen the situation for lower-income groups.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
Economic views express skepticism regarding the government's economic policy, with particular doubt cast on the effectiveness of opening the labor quota. It is being questioned whether importing people (the so-called "bright minds") is truly the primary source of innovation for the Estonian economy.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Economic viewpoints are strictly opposed to tax increases, especially concerning the land tax, which is considered a burden for 520,000 households. Warnings are issued that tax hikes will harm food production and facilitate the acquisition of land by foreign capital with deep pockets. Criticism is leveled at the state for assigning responsibilities to local governments without providing funding, thereby forcing them to raise the land tax.
2024-05-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, information briefing
Insufficient data.
2024-05-28
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
Economic perspectives stress the necessity of shielding pensioners from rising tax burdens and question state austerity measures that hurt household incomes. The general sentiment towards the banking sector is negative, accusing them of continually raking in profits via interest charges.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Economic views emphasize opposition to new taxes (such as the car tax) and additional costs imposed on private owners, particularly regarding the non-eligibility of VAT for subsidies during reconstruction projects. They demand fair compensation for private forests placed under protection and criticize the bureaucracy and costs associated with the green transition. Regarding mining, there is support for the utilization of mineral resources, but there are suspicions regarding the lack of transparency in the preparation for phosphorite mining.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
The speaker objects to the austerity measures imposed on local municipalities and opposes importing additional labor from third countries, especially given the high domestic unemployment rate of 7.8%. He emphasizes the necessity of stimulating the economy and supports the efficient and swift utilization of regional development funds (ÕÜF).
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
Economic views are linked to the state's financial responsibility in implementing education reforms. The speaker criticizes the state for insufficient funding provided to municipalities for the transition to Estonian-language instruction, emphasizing the need to ensure local governments have adequate resources to fulfill state obligations.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Economic views strongly oppose tax increases, emphasizing the cumulative negative impact of various taxes (VAT, income tax, excise duties, and the sweetened beverage tax) on consumer prices and household budgets. Meeting budgetary targets is viewed as the government's sole motivation, and there is criticism regarding the inflation of administrative costs, specifically highlighting the unreasonably large personnel expenses (3 million) required for tax administration.
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
The speaker is critical of the increase in state fees and fine rates, especially when this occurs without an impact assessment. They are interested in the fair application of the tax system, specifically asking about special provisions for tax-free income concerning working pensioners. The speaker avoids general economic debate (e.g., raising the minimum wage), demanding that the focus remain on specific legislation.
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker emphasized the importance of projections when drafting both the national budget and the European Union budget. He/She expressed the view that stimulating the economy should be the priority, questioning the introduction of additional green regulations and recommending that the brakes be put on them.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Not enough data.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Supports measures that encourage workforce participation, such as allowing part-time work while on sick leave after 60 days. It is stressed that this generates income for the employee while also filling the state coffers through various taxes, indicating a positive approach to increasing tax revenue via increased work activity.
2024-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
Economic arguments support channeling the additional funds generated by tax increases (VAT, excises) into infrastructure investments and support for local municipalities. The preference is for the targeted allocation of this new revenue toward improving vital public services.
2024-04-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker supports state intervention and securing additional funding for veterinary training, deeming it crucial for national security. There have been previous proposals to reduce the VAT on foodstuffs (including vegetables) to improve consumer affordability and bolster the production sector. The government’s current approach is being criticized for prioritizing fiscal discipline and the bottom line in an Excel spreadsheet over the actual viability of the sector.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker is a strong proponent of economic growth and improving the business environment through deregulation. They support cost-efficiency in road transport to reduce the unit cost of transporting goods. They oppose tax increases (excise duties, heavy vehicle tax) that damage the competitiveness of logistics companies.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
Criticism is mounting over the new motor vehicle tax, specifically regarding the potentially unequal treatment of registration fees compared to EU standards. This raises concerns about tax equity and international competitiveness.
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The economic platform focuses on fiscal responsibility and identifying alternative revenue streams. It supports implementing a banking levy, estimated to yield 150 million, and criticizes the government's expensive election pledges (700–900 million), which exacerbate the budget deficit.
2024-04-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient data
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The economic considerations pertain to replenishing the state coffers, pointing to the possibility of collecting fines for protective structures built without the consent of the Environmental Board after the state of emergency ends. This indicates a pragmatic approach to collecting state funds.
2024-04-03
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Economic perspectives favor the interests of producers and call for the easing of regulations, particularly concerning working time accounting, to boost efficiency. The speaker objects to the mounting bureaucracy, which inefficiently compels businesses to hire more staff, and demands the simplification of the application process for area subsidies to ensure stable production.
2024-04-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2024-04-01
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker supports ensuring employment for Estonia's own people and opposes the import of labor from outside the country. They emphasize the role of trade unions in wage negotiations and demand control over labor leasing companies registered outside Estonia. Furthermore, they consider the benefit paid for raising children to be justified and crucial for providing a sense of security.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Economic positions stress fiscal discipline and solidarity, supporting the elimination of expense reimbursements for members of parliament (MPs), which total approximately 1.4 million euros. The aim is to set an example during a difficult period by prioritizing savings over political privileges.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.
Economic perspectives strongly advocate for investments to remain in Estonia and for job creation, particularly within the biomass processing and timber industries. Concerns are also raised regarding the balance between taxation and environmental sustainability, alongside criticism directed at the controversial use of public procurement.
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
The speaker advocates for lowering taxes to stimulate the economy, specifically reducing VAT on food and pharmaceuticals, in order to decrease costs for the end consumer. He is strongly opposed to new taxes (such as the sugar tax and the motor vehicle tax), arguing that they only exacerbate the existing lack of confidence. As an alternative source of funding, he proposes implementing a bank tax to avoid cutting subsidies and benefits currently provided to families.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
Economic views are focused on opposing the increase in the tax burden (new taxes) and criticizing the reduction of family benefits. Preference is given to a fiscal policy that supports young people and families with the aim of boosting the birth rate.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Economic views focus on regulatory clarity and the performance of investments. Clarity is demanded regarding the deadlines for minimum tax declarations, and doubts are raised about the economic impact of renewable energy projects, given that local workers have not been observed. The interests of entrepreneurs are supported by questioning the necessity of ratifying the Korean aviation agreement and by emphasizing the inclusion of employers in healthcare information days.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker stresses the importance of fiscal transparency and is skeptical about introducing new taxes to fund salary increases while, simultaneously, there is talk of making cutbacks. He is demanding a precise accounting of the planned size and utilization of state budget revenues, specifically revenues from things like emissions trading.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker advocates for policies that help families and individuals save money through taxation, and he is against taxes that impoverish them. He supports introducing a bank tax to utilize the profits generated by the rise in Euribor for the country's benefit. He criticizes the government's current activities as "redistribution of poverty."
2024-02-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
Lack of data
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Our economic perspective advocates for lowering taxes (specifically, reducing VAT to 5%) in order to stimulate consumption and enhance the competitiveness of domestic producers. We prioritize achieving stable, long-term tax revenue and support micro and small enterprises, along with encouraging investment through retained earnings, which stands in opposition to the current policy of increasing taxation.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The speaker supports increasing public expenditure within the framework of the state budget strategy, demanding a significant pay raise for the employees of the Rescue Board and the Police and Border Guard Board (PPA). This demonstrates a readiness to prioritize internal security expenditure.
2024-02-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
Economic perspectives concern the state's use of funds for digital development and international support. The speaker stresses the need to clarify whether the 800,000 euros for the mRiik app constitutes a fee for using the platform or direct support for the reconstruction of Ukraine.
2024-02-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The economic platform strongly advocates for tax cuts, particularly lowering the VAT on food products, in order to stimulate consumption and ease the burden on the end consumer. The speaker opposes raising indirect taxes (excise duties, VAT, and a potential car tax), arguing that these measures stifle consumption and increase the cost of living.
2024-02-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
Economic viewpoints emphasize that the requirement for special food labeling is not an intervention in business freedom, but rather a means of ensuring clarity in consumer choices. The speaker prioritizes consumer information and safety over the desire of businesses to keep labeling optional, which indicates support for regulation aimed at ensuring a fair market.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
Economic views indirectly relate to tax incentive policy, emphasizing the inclusion of NGOs on the list, which indicates support for targeted tax relief. The goal is to support charitable activities aimed at assisting Ukrainian combatants.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The speaker is critical of the increasing regulations and bureaucracy, which create difficulties for businesses and farmers and restrict production. He emphasizes the necessity of ensuring the livelihood and economic viability of people in rural areas. He opposes environmental measures that reduce carbon emissions by shutting down production.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
Economic perspectives center on the efficient utilization of labor resources, raising questions regarding the employment of temporary protection beneficiaries and the support provided by the Unemployment Insurance Fund (Töötukassa). Robust state investment in regionally significant sports infrastructure is supported, provided that the funding has been planned within the framework of the budget strategy.
2024-01-25
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Economic views are strongly aligned with agricultural producers, opposing the government's proposed tax increases (including excise duties, VAT, the heavy vehicle tax, and environmental fees). It is argued that this tax burden will make Estonian food significantly more expensive and stifle farmers' operations. They also support national supply security, which necessitates state intervention to guarantee food reserves.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker advocates for policies that stimulate economic growth and reduce the tax burden, specifically highlighting the reduction of excise duty rates to boost business activity. Furthermore, they support increasing the compensation provided for the use of personal vehicles, signaling a positive stance on easing both business and labor expenditures.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Economic perspectives are tied to strategic investment in the defense industry, which is deemed to require acceleration and modernization. Food security is addressed as an issue of critical supply chain management and national preparedness, requiring government intervention.
2024-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker opposes new taxes (like the car tax), particularly when they disproportionately hurt residents in rural areas. He is skeptical of mandatory investments that require constant borrowing, especially since any benefits (such as reduced utility costs) are ultimately offset by the loan repayments. Instead, he advocates for stimulating the economy and developing enterprise through improvements to road infrastructure.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The policy strongly advocates for tax cuts for both individuals (19.7%, 19.1%) and businesses to mitigate economic difficulties and 40% inflation. The objective is to enhance people's financial resilience, meet basic needs, and ensure the sustainable development of enterprises. Furthermore, it supports achieving state financial savings by reducing the number of officials at the Tax and Customs Board.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Insufficient data.
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
Economic views are strongly opposed to tax hikes, arguing that raising VAT, income tax, and excise duties will "tax the nation to death" and force businesses to close down. They prefer state funds to be directed toward bolstering domestic defense capabilities rather than foreign aid. Concern is also voiced regarding job losses in road transport companies because of the Rail Baltic project.
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Not enough data
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Economic views are focused on lowering taxes (reducing the VAT rate to 16.5% or 19.1%) as the main means of improving people's standard of living. A lower tax burden and measures that promote economic growth are preferred.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Economic considerations emphasize the transparency and value maximization of the sale of the state asset (Nordica). The speaker is concerned that the company might be sold before its potential profitability and viability have been fully established, thereby supporting the preservation of the national carrier.