By Plenary Sessions: Lauri Laats

High levels of participation in plenary sessions were observed on the same day (multiple speeches on 2025-05-21), within a context where the opposition is raising questions and rhetoric from various angles. References to highlighting factional visits and specific groups (e.g., Rescue Board employees) indicate regular, active involvement and a profile of political fighting throughout the entire day.

Two addresses delivered during the information hour on the same day (2025-05-21) indicate a high level of activity and thematic consistency. The speeches focus on the IMF and issues concerning tax and fiscal policy, demonstrating direct participation in the Q&A sessions and continued debate on the same subject matter.

The addresses will take place during a single plenary session, where multiple differing viewpoints are presented sequentially within the same framework. The text refers to the presiding officer, and emphasis is placed on the consistent adherence to the topics; the record will note the minutes and the repeated discussion concerning the state budget bills.

Signs of heightened attention and activity: the mention of the initial submission of the inquiry (March 19) and consistent critical proposals following press or plenary sessions. Both the acceptance of questions and the expectation of substantive debate are represented; there are repeated references to decisions at the Brussels level, CAP negotiations, and criticism regarding the government's functioning. Overall, the pattern of activity demonstrates a focus on the control of power and the structuring of the legislative process.

The representative took part in several speeches during the same plenary session and used the same thematic examples (CO2 market, GO certificates).—Refers to other sessions and discussions of draft legislation (e.g., Rain Epler’s bill) and provides references concerning them.—Uses skating and travel experiences (Florida, United States; clean energy discussion) as examples of global developments.

During the same session (14.05.2025), he/she spoke three times during the Information Hour, focusing on budget and taxation issues. He/She cites the media (ERR) and confirms that the arguments are based on public sources; emphasizes the necessity of specifically addressing potential solutions and incorporating the following steps (negotiations, special committee).

Attended an intensive plenary session on May 13, 2025, and put forward several penetrating and far-reaching viewpoints regarding energy policy; reiterates the necessary steps toward a broad-based discussion and a referendum; references information briefings and earlier debates, and demands the inclusion of certain deputies from the coalition; emphasizes continued engagement and the upcoming campaign momentum.

The individual speaks consecutively in various forms of debate throughout the same day; utilizes interpellations and lists of submitted questions (e.g., 7 questions addressed to the Minister of Foreign Affairs); emphasizes the necessity of prompt responses and continuous monitoring regarding the explanations provided. While strong participation in cooperation and discussion is evident within the context of committees and the Riigikogu, this activity demonstrates a steady rhythm of oversight and questioning rather than proactive initiation of action.