By Agendas: Leo Kunnas

Total Agendas: 67

Fully Profiled: 67

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
2025-09-24
First reading of the draft resolution (705 OE) of the Riigikogu, "The use of the Defence Forces in fulfilling Estonia's international obligations in a North Atlantic Treaty Organization or member state, European Union, or United Nations-led international military operation involving the initial contribution thereto."

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.

There is no opposition, as the speaker is focusing on outlining the procedure of the draft legislation and the consensus decisions of the National Defence Committee. No criticism is being leveled against any political group or individual.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-15
An inquiry regarding the hindrance of development in the defence industry (no 783)

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting

The criticism targets the decision-makers responsible for developing the defense industry and managing state procurements, accusing them of shortsightedness and making economically detrimental errors. He criticizes policies that favor cheap foreign acquisitions (e.g., from Brazil or Turkey) over domestic production. Furthermore, he implies that the Commander of the Defense Forces is being forced to accept decisions imposed upon him.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-10
First reading of the draft law on civil crisis and state defense

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

There is no direct opposition or criticism aimed at specific opponents. The speaker addresses the issue raised in the debate, but does so in a constructive, non-aggressive manner, asserting that the concern has already been resolved within the current process.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-09
The Minister of Defence's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035"

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.

The main criticism is directed at the Minister of Defense (Hanno) and his presentation. The criticism is both procedural and political, focusing on the failure to adhere to the strategy document's objectives in the reporting, as well as the irrelevance of the material presented. The intensity of the attack is high, calling into question the entire value of the strategy document itself.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-04
Chair implementation

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The main opponent is the Government of the Republic and Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, who are being pressed for answers regarding deficiencies in defense capability and the replenishment of reserves. The criticism is policy-driven, accusing the government of failing to take practical steps following the designation of Russia as a terrorist regime. A protest is also being lodged against the substantive consideration of the inquiry, citing procedural hurdles.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-16
Draft law amending the Emergency Situations Act and other laws (662 SE) - first reading

XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting

The criticism is directed at the government (or the responsible minister) who is responsible for Bill 662 SE. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the danger and impracticality of postponing the requirement to establish non-public shelters.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-04
Draft law (642 SE) on the withdrawal from the convention prohibiting the use, stockpiling, production and transfer of anti-personnel mines and requiring their destruction – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism is directed at idealistic positions that fail to account for military realities and stands in opposition to the arguments put forth by the International Red Cross. The example of Cambodia, cited by colleague Kalle, is dismissed by explaining the fundamental difference inherent in the Estonian context. The speaker seeks to eliminate counterarguments by stressing that Estonia lacks the threat of a guerrilla movement that would justify compliance with the convention.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-02
An inquiry regarding the narrowing scope of Estonian as a language of scientific study and the quality of university education (no. 764)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session

The stance is one of scrutiny toward the government, as the question is addressed to the minister, demanding clarification regarding the government's policy. There is no direct criticism or confrontation; the attitude is rather procedural. Insufficient data.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-22
Draft law amending the Value Added Tax Act (596 SE) – First Reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The main opponent is the Government of the Republic and Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, whose claims regarding the reasons for the tax hikes are under attack. The criticism is aimed at the government’s rhetoric and its avoidance of political responsibility, calling into question the credibility of their explanations. The intensity of the attack is high, challenging the fundamental premise of the government’s defense.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-19
Inquiry regarding labor productivity, Estonia's competitiveness, and cheap labor (no. 742)

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The main confrontation is directed at the economic claims made by the minister and the government. The criticism is strictly policy- and results-based, focusing on the failure of key economic indicators (specifically, the decline in productivity and competitiveness). The opponent's positive assertions (innovation, robotization) are used rhetorically to demonstrate their lack of effectiveness.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-26
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – Third Reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The speaker is responding to a previous discussion concerning the readiness of grey passport holders to defend the state. The rebuttal is aimed more at correcting inaccurate claims and clarifying facts, rather than direct personal criticism. He addresses one of the debate participants directly ("Dear Ants!").
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-19
Draft law amending the Defence Service Act (563 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The main criticism is aimed at the executive branch (the Ministry of Defence and the Government of the Republic) for work left undone and the diffusion of responsibility, since the allowance rates remained unadjusted for eight years. He blames the emergence of this situation on the transfer of the Defence Forces personnel sector (J1 structures) to the Defence Resources Agency, which has created an abnormal system.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-17
An inquiry regarding the narrowing scope of Estonian as a language of science (no. 716)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is directed at the current higher education policy and, implicitly, at the minister responsible for it, from whom an explanation is being demanded. The opposition is policy-based, focusing on the system's lack of rationality and its inefficiency in international competition.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-03-17
An inquiry regarding the shrinking scope of Estonian language usage (no. 711)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is leveled against the government or politicians who are planning to further increase immigration quotas. This opposition is policy-based, stressing that such action disregards previous failures in integration and jeopardizes the state’s overall capacity.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-17
Inquiry Regarding Plans for the Construction of a Wind Farm on Saaremaa (No. 680)

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed squarely at the government's policy, questioning how it is possible to reconcile massive increases in defense spending with the current system of subsidized energy production. No direct personal opposition is being voiced; instead, a political challenge is being presented.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-30
Draft law amending § 5 of the Act on the Election of Municipal Councils (530 SE) – First Reading

Fifteenth Estonian Parliament, fifth session, plenary session.

There is no direct mutual criticism, but the speaker challenges positions that question the constitutionality of the solution he proposed or the legal weight of the Riigikogu (Parliament) statements. He stresses that if the statements (such as recognizing Russia as a terrorist state) carry no weight, there is no point in adopting them. He does not attempt to argue on the legal front, where he lacks the necessary competence.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-21
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu "Submitting a proposal to the Government of the Republic for the procurement of ammunition with a cost of 1.6 billion euros for the years 2025–2028" (540 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

The opposition is indirect, targeting those who deem the increase in defense spending financially impossible because of the European Union's stability criteria. The criticism is policy-driven, highlighting Estonia's inability to find solutions compared to Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-01-20
Inquiry regarding the promotion of family and large families (no. 667)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The primary adversary is the Government of the Republic as a whole, whose efforts to combat the demographic catastrophe are being critically evaluated. The criticism focuses on the inefficiency and lack of effectiveness of the government’s actions, calling for a direct numerical assessment.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-09
Inquiry regarding phosphate mining plans (no. 664)

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting

The opposition is aimed at the assessment process for the mining plans, specifically criticizing the failure to gather sufficient information regarding analogous environmental damages. The critique is both procedural and policy-driven, casting doubt on the adequacy of the current risk analysis.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-04
The second reading of the draft resolution (479 OE) of the Riigikogu concerning "The use of the Defence Forces in fulfilling Estonia’s international obligations in a North Atlantic Treaty Organization or member state, European Union, or United Nations-led international military operation, upon its initial contribution"

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The direct opposition is not criticized, but the speaker addresses concerns raised by colleagues (such as Raini and Kalle Grünthal) regarding UN operations and the potential abuse of the mandate. He expresses indirect criticism of previous executive decisions that bypassed the Riigikogu (for instance, the Polish border operation conducted under the guise of international cooperation). He also expresses deep suspicion regarding the actions of the UN Secretary-General, who supports the Putin regime.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-13
Second reading of the draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The primary criticism targets the quality of the government and its governance, which is deemed poor and prevents the making of adequate decisions. The criticism is both procedural (uncontrolled budgeting) and political (distortion of the defense budget due to aid for Ukraine, and ill-advised strategic investments). The opposition is intense because, in the speaker's view, the government's actions are sending the wrong signal.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-13
Draft law amending the State Budget Act (511 SE) - Second Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.

The criticism is primarily aimed at the budget methodology established by the government and the ministries, which is deemed uncontrolled and opaque. The speaker suggests that the ministries devised these metrics simply to satisfy a requirement, rather than to genuinely measure reality. The critique is heavily procedural and policy-driven, calling for a fundamental overhaul of the system.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-11
Draft law amending the Act on Termination of Pregnancy and Sterilisation (459 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The confrontation is directed at those who do not recognize abortion as killing, thereby creating a "moral or ethical watershed" in the chamber. The criticism is strongly ethical and value-based, focusing on society's inability to grasp the true nature of the act.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-06
First reading of the draft resolution (479 OE) of the Riigikogu concerning "The use of the Defence Forces in fulfilling the international obligations of the Republic of Estonia in a North Atlantic Treaty Organisation or member state, European Union, or United Nations-led international military operation involving the first contribution thereto."

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

Insufficient data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-21
Inquiry regarding the provision of international protection to Ukrainian male citizens who are mobilization-eligible.

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

There is no direct confrontation, but criticism is aimed at the current strategic approach of both Ukraine and its allies, which has failed to secure victory. They specifically criticize the excessive focus on military aid (weapons and funding) instead of reforming the personnel system. Corruption in Ukrainian military commissariats is also mentioned.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-21
Inquiry Regarding the Confiscation of the Estonian Soldier Memorial (no 642)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is aimed at historical policies that have excluded Estonians who fought against the Red Army from the focus of state commemoration. The opposition is directed instead at the narrative and inaction that have created a situation where only the memory of Red Army fighters has been properly honored.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-16
Draft Security Tax Act (512 SE) – First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The criticism is directed against the defense policy of previous periods (the "affordable national defense" doctrine) and the "fine-tuning," which led to the accumulation of a ten-year shortfall. The speaker emphasizes that this inaction occurred at a time when the threat landscape had already shifted (the annexation of Crimea). The criticism is policy-based and focuses on strategic omissions.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-24
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Funded Pensions Act and Other Acts (464 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting

Not enough data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-18
Second Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Emergency Situation Act and Related Amendments to Other Acts (426 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

Direct political opposition is not the target of criticism; rather, the focus is on the resistance or hesitation observed among certain involved stakeholders. Specific mention is made of food producers and general practitioners (GPs) who were hesitant or even explicitly requested not to be classified as providers of vital services. This criticism is aimed at their reluctance to accept national defense obligations.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-16
2024 Report by the Minister of the Interior on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.

The data is insufficient because the speaker asked questions solely for clarification, not to express criticism or opposition.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-11
Minister of Defence's 2024 Report on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session

Strong criticism has been directed against the Defence Resources Agency’s (KRA) system for consolidating active duty personnel. The opposition is both procedural and political, stressing that the system is inefficient, unique within the NATO context, and unsuitable for leadership during wartime.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-07-22
Granting Authorization to Prime Ministerial Candidate Kristen Michal to Form the Government

15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.

The opposition's stance is expressed through constant comparison with the previous government’s decisions and the RES, thereby calling into question the actual scope of the new plans and their difference from previous measures. The criticism is policy-based and focuses specifically on financial transparency and the substance of the activities.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-10
Interpellation concerning the enhancement of the Defense Forces' wartime engineer capabilities, informed by the experiences of the current stage of the Russia-Ukraine War (No. 607)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The primary criticism is aimed at the Government of the Republic and the Prime Minister, as they are viewed as the ultimate decision-makers regarding finances and are therefore responsible for guaranteeing defense capability. The criticism is rooted in policy and procedure, demanding clear answers and timelines concerning both the replenishment of relinquished stocks and the specifics of the new reinforcement package. The intensity of the criticism is moderate, yet demanding.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-04
First Reading of the Bill for the Act Amending the Emergency Situation Act and Related Acts (426 SE)

15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting

Insufficient data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-04
First reading of the Draft Resolution (331 OE) of the Riigikogu titled: "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Obligate All Reservists to Permanently Keep Firearms at Home Along with a Considerable Quantity of Ammunition, and to Provide Reservists with Financial Assistance for This Purpose If Necessary"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.

The primary resistance targets political inertia and the insufficient sense of urgency among members of the Riigikogu (Parliament), which is preventing the bill from being passed. Furthermore, the position of the Ministry of Defence is cited, stating that current legislation does not permit the change without an extensive overhaul of the legal framework. The criticism is aimed at the lack of political will, rather than specific individuals.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-03
First Reading of the Draft Resolution (409 OE) of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Implement Effective Measures to Protect Minors from Exposure to Pornography"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.

Insufficient information.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-03
The written motion for a vote of no confidence in the Minister of Economic Affairs and Information Technology, Tiit Riisalo, submitted by 22 members of the Riigikogu.

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.

The speaker, who is in opposition to the government, posed a critical question to the Minister of Economic Affairs and Information Technology. The criticism is directed at the government's inaction and its failure to achieve strategic goals in the development of the defense industry.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-27
Interpellation concerning the need for prenatal protection of the right to life of children (No. 554)

Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session

The primary opposition is aimed at the minister or the presiding officer of the session, as well as the position that denies legal personhood to unborn children. The criticism is extremely intense and morally charged, accusing the opposing side of supporting the kind of arbitrariness typical of totalitarian regimes. The opponent's viewpoint is regarded as dangerous and fundamentally incorrect.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-16
Debate on the matter of national importance initiated by the Economic Affairs Committee: "How to increase productivity in the Estonian economy?"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session

Insufficient data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-09
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Security Institutions Act (330 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.

Direct political opponents are not criticized; instead, reference is made to the previous national defense policy that reduced the wartime defense forces, labeling it ineffective. The speaker dismisses concerns about a potential conflict arising between the Defense Forces and the Security Police, deeming such a conflict impossible. The criticism is instead aimed at inertia and the system's slow adaptation to the changed security situation.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-06
A written motion submitted by 22 members of the Riigikogu for a vote of no confidence in the Minister of Education and Research, Kristina Kallas

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The opposition is expressed through a question directed at the minister concerning the future directions of education policy, signaling the scrutiny of the government's activities. The criticism is simply a demand for policy clarity and is devoid of any personal or attacking tone.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-02
First Reading of the Riigikogu Draft Statement (420 AE) "On Declaring the Moscow Patriarchate an Institution Supporting the Military Aggression of the Russian Federation"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The opposition was directed at the initial version of the draft bill because its content was too broad and fundamentally flawed, specifically for declaring an entire religious organization as terrorist. The criticism is aimed at the substance of the earlier legislative text, rather than specific political opponents.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-17
Second Reading of the Draft Act (344 SE) on the Amendment of the Riigikogu Election Act and Related Amendment of Other Acts

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The opposition's position is directed against the actions of the Riigikogu committee, which labeled substantive amendments as "insincere" and illegally bundled them together. The criticism is both procedural and political, accusing the opposing side of disregarding the need to ensure elementary security and transparency. The opponents' actions are being linked to the practices of authoritarian regimes, referencing Stalin's quote regarding the importance of counting votes.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-16
The Minister of Culture's 2024 Report on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035" (including the implementation of the "Estonian Sports Policy Fundamentals until 2030")

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The opposition is directed at the government's continued reliance on the "Eesti 2035" strategy in its current form. The criticism is both procedural and policy-based, as the document is deemed inadequate given the changed circumstances. The intensity of the criticism is moderately strong, demanding a comprehensive overhaul.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-16
Third reading of the Draft Act amending the Act on Precious Metal Products, the State Fees Act, and the Equipment Safety Act (363 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at previous governments who sold off Estonia’s historical gold reserves, and the current financial policy, which has failed to establish genuine reserves. The opposition is rooted in policy and strategy, focusing on the short-sightedness demonstrated in assessing financial risks and managing reserves.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-10
Third Reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of the Defence League Act and the Amendment of Other Acts Related Thereto (Bill 335 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The speaker dismisses the general criticism aimed at the commission's pace and efficiency, asserting that the commission is simply carrying out its duties. He also references earlier "stray ideas" originating from the Ministry of Defense—for instance, the proposal to sell the Defense League (Kaitseliit) building—which was opposed by the central organs of the Kaitseliit, thereby demonstrating institutional resistance to the ministry's drastic plans.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-03
Second Reading of the Bill on the Amendment of the Electronic Communications Act and the Nature Conservation Act (392 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The opposing side consists of those who submitted amendments that removed the national defense exemptions from the bill. They are being criticized for their hesitation and their desire to prolong the discussion, which the speaker deems unreasonable given the obvious nature of the issue. The criticism is aimed at their procedural uncertainty and political indecisiveness when regulating crisis situations.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-03
First Reading of the Draft Resolution (274 OE) of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Prepare and Restore a Militarized Border Guard as a Separate Agency"

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The criticism is directed at previous governments and the lack of a state governance concept, specifically faulting the prime ministers who failed to insist on the establishment of a comprehensive governance framework. The critique itself is conceptual and structural, focusing on "siloization" and the error of merging agencies, rather than being personal.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-02
Interpellation concerning the abuse of power by the PPA (Police and Border Guard Board) in connection with the unlawful suppression of freedom of speech and expression (No. 620)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The criticism is aimed at the responsible institutions or the government, which have failed to address the issue of symbols of the Soviet legacy, even though the historical facts have become evident. The criticism is procedural, focusing on inaction and a lack of accountability.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-01
Interpellation Regarding Mass Immigration (No. 617)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

Political opponents and procedural errors are not criticized; the focus is on national threats and the capacity of the security agency. The main threats referred to are Russia's subversive activities and radical Islam.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-13
First reading of the Draft Decision of the Riigikogu (322 OE) "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Prepare a Comprehensive National Defence Development Vision Extending up to the Year 2045 and a New Extraordinary National Defence Development Plan Deriving from It, Extending up to the Year 2034"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.

The criticism is aimed primarily at the lack of strategic thinking among previous Defence Forces leaderships, top Ministry of Defence officials, and politicians, which resulted in errors concerning "affordable" national defense and personnel management. It also criticizes the current government for delaying the decision on the new reinforcement package. On the foreign policy front, it faults Europe for attempting to proceed "as if this war were not happening."
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-06
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Local Government Council Election Act (290 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

Insufficient data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-04
Interpellation concerning the introduction of the vehicle tax (No. 304)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The opposition is directed at the specific wording and the scope of exemptions within the car tax draft bill presented by the government. The criticism is policy- and procedure-centric, highlighting the impracticality of the bill from the perspective of the operations of state agencies.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-07
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Value-Added Tax Act (264 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.

Too little data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-02-07
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (182 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.

There is not enough data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-25
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Emergency Situation Act (124 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The criticism is directed at the Government Office's inaction in advancing the draft law, noting a two-year delay. The structural shortcoming of the Ministry of Regional Affairs is also highlighted, specifically because they lack a separate body that could physically handle the management of reserves. The criticism is procedural and structural.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-24
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (Bill 186 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

There is insufficient data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-24
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Alcohol, Tobacco, Fuel, and Electricity Excise Duty Act (129 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

There is not enough data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Bill amending the Income Tax Act (254 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Not enough data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Income Tax Act (200 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient information.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
Draft Act Amending the Income Tax Act (195 SE), First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-17
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Income Tax Act (178 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-15
Interpellation regarding the capability to ensure internal security in the new situation where uncontrolled immigration has made the people of Estonia worried about their property and their lives (No. 536)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

There is no direct confrontation or criticism aimed at political opponents; the speaker is posing a question in order to clarify data and definitions related to migration. The criticism is instead directed toward the vague nature of the discussion surrounding the concept of migration.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-15
Interpellation concerning the enhancement of the wartime indirect fire capability of the Defense Forces (No. 72)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The criticism is aimed at the government and the prime minister, who stand accused of a sluggish decision-making process and inadequate funding for developing indirect fire capabilities. It is specifically highlighted that the current government is merely executing decisions made by previous administrations and has failed to establish an adequate replacement plan for the weapons systems donated to Ukraine. The criticism is both policy-based and procedural.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-10
First reading of the Draft Act amending the Value-Added Tax Act (Bill 132 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

Insufficient Data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-10
First Reading of the Bill on Amendments to the Value-Added Tax Act (108 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The opposition is directed at the government’s tax hike policy, which is being slammed for its inefficiency and the economic damage it is expected to cause. The criticism is both political and economic, centering on the anticipated drop in turnover and the movement of shoppers to Latvia. There are no personal attacks; instead, the focus remains on predicting the failure of the policy itself.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-01-09
First Reading of the Draft Bill on Amendments to the State Assets Act and the Land Cadastre Act (327 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The criticism is procedural, targeting the actions of the bill's lead committee or the rapporteur for failing to involve the National Defence Committee. The opposition is intense, but it focuses solely on the procedural error, not the substance of the draft legislation.
View Profile View Agenda
Back to Profiling