By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

In the interests of working and vulnerable groups within society: criticizes service cuts (residents, pensioners, emergency services, jobs), emphasizes that the budget must guarantee social safeguards and avoid harmful consequences for residents.

Not enough data.

It emphasizes social vulnerability in the context of tax changes: noting that tax increases reduce people’s purchasing power and increase poverty and theft; highlights the vulnerability risks for pensioners and the middle class and the need to ensure social justice and stability. Criticism is based on moral and social considerations and emphasizes a more trustworthy and fairer state.

It emphasizes social vulnerability: protecting pensioners, preventing poverty, and addressing difficulties in making ends meet. It claims that tax increases, including the security tax, may increase the resources of those lurking and expand access based on income. It stands for solidarity and is critical of the gatherings of low-wage earners and pensioners.

Data unavailable.

There is not enough data regarding social issues (e.g., abortion, LGBT+, immigration, education, social justice).

Not enough data.

Not enough data.