By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

A supportive and emotional tone combined with aggressive, accusatory criticism and a hidden, analytical legal argument; uses rhetorical questions and personal references (addressing pensioners, an example of the impact of decisions affecting the elderly). Sometimes formal and technical, but mainly inclusive of the community and principled.

The tone is confrontational and directly critical, employing emotional and case-based rhetoric. Questions are posed and there are emphatic exclamations stating that policy is misdirected and people’s well-being is the priority. The text uses moral and social judgments and reduces complex economic policy to simplified conclusions.

The tone is critical yet constructive; it uses fact-based arguments and ends with a question to engage listeners. Well-formulated, but with a critical undertone, and uses direct language.

The tone of the speeches is combative, brutally critical, and emotionally charged, often employing rhetorical questions and personal names. Irony also emerges in the texts, along with the use of quoted references from history (e.g., the mention of Louis XIV) to emphasize the incomprehension of the government’s attitude. Keyword-laden and fact-filled presentations, often brimming with clichés, are frequently balanced with a morally motivating message directed towards the public.

The factual narrative is fact-based and driven by inquiry, often formal and analytical. It utilizes concrete examples and figures, posing underlying questions and inviting further questioning, which leads to the involvement of various factions. The tone is substantive, focusing on expressions of thought and reasoning; it is sometimes concerned and critical, but free of personal attacks.

The rhetoric is primarily adversarial and critical, employing emotional rhetorical techniques (such as, “Are you kidding me?”) alongside claims that are heavily supported by evidence. It offers numerous examples and sharply defines the overall context.

A direct and fact-focused tone; it presents specific data and questions, such as “How is it possible…?”; it employs references that contextualize the roles of the National Audit Office and the ministry; it strengthens the accusations through a fact-based approach while maintaining an official style.

A formal and respectful tone, yet critical in substance; it utilizes questioning as a means of asserting shared management and accountability rights. It balances emotional input with fact-based discussion, emphasizing the search for conclusions and opportunities for improvement. The text is structured, deliberate, and aimed at demanding accountability.

A formal and inquiry-driven tone, combining emotional awareness of threats with fact-based argumentation. It employs an interrogative style in discourse, emphasizing scientific and data-driven evidence, and seeks to demonstrate thorough deliberation and reasonable criticism. Some ideas are presented as suggestions or as a requirement for further information.