By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

All parliamentarians are called upon to accept a joint vote, and emphasis is placed on cooperation with the opposition against the coalition, but concrete multi-party entanglements remain primarily contextual. It demonstrates a clear area of factional cooperation, but focuses on its own faction's position and the promotion of its interests.

Not enough data.

Expresses a willingness for discussion and cooperation, but does not refer to a coalition; posing questions to the listener indicates a desire to find consensus.

It demonstrates a willingness to involve stakeholders and experts in committee discussions (e.g., written feedback from stakeholder groups and the inclusion of various experts), but at the same time emphasizes the need for parliamentary oversight and the coordination of conflicting, ongoing changes within the coalition. The collaboration aims to increase budget transparency, but does not envision extensive, bipolar cooperation with the coalition.

The central approach is bipartisanship and moving forward jointly through the establishment of a special investigative commission. Emphasis is placed on the need to involve all factions and collectively find balanced solutions between the coalition and the opposition. This recommended cooperation is underscored by the requirement that the use of public funds must be targeted and purposeful, and the composition of the team is essential.

Demonstrates readiness for cooperation with the Riigikogu and ministries, emphasizing the need for discussion and the submission of amendment proposals; wishes to involve the coalition and the Ministry of Finance through open discussion and to supplement the basis for individual support; while maintaining a firm, critical position.

In cooperation, it demonstrates a willingness to increase control and auditing, but fails to clearly highlight a unified coalition of coordinated efforts; it emphasizes the necessity for the Ministry and RMK to ensure transparency and, if required, conduct an independent audit in collaboration with parliamentary mechanisms.

Insufficient data.

The cooperation dynamic, observed via contact and information requests, indicates that questions are posed to the minister and explanations are demanded, but the primary motivation for a direct coalition or cooperation platform is perceived to be the desire for control and information, rather than broad-based collaboration. The overall style is question-driven and fact-based, not coalition-centric.