By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

The legislative focus is on supporting pensioners, avoiding tax reforms, and funding social and healthcare services; the central topic is the discussion regarding the backlog in the adoption of bills and the suspension of the second reading, and the connection between the draft law on a dubious bill and the amendment of the state secretary's educational requirements.

Not enough data.

The legislation’s focus is on the involvement of interest groups, coordination periods, and the role of the intention to develop; 23 bills have been highlighted, with less than five working days for coordination.

The focus is on the process of bills and increasing the Riigikogu’s control; the need to amend the state budget law is emphasized (a budget based on expenditure, performance indicators), the timely placement of bills on the agenda, and limiting the possibilities for ministers to amend the budget after the Riigikogu’s approval. With confirmations, the need to improve the integrity of explanatory notes and data is emphasized, and plans are presented for katkes.

The legislator’s priorities are the formation of a special committee for Rail Baltic and increasing budget transparency, including a systematic review of the feasibility analysis and risk management; efforts will be made to seek consensus between the coalition and the opposition, and to establish a parliamentary oversight mechanism responsible for providing answers to questions.

Key legislative priorities: amending the State Budget Act (explaining the expenditure-based/clearly described budget objectives and performance indicators in the explanatory memorandum); intentions to amend the Budget Base Act; strong emphasis on restoring transparency and control in the budget process and clarifying the responsibility of ministries; additionally, it requires clarifications regarding the distribution of grants and cooperation at the level of the Riigikogu.

The legislative focus is centered on establishing independent audits and greater transparency in the management of RMK (State Forest Management Centre) and associated contracts. Emphasis is placed on the need for increased oversight and accountability, alongside the development of a potential legal framework that would allow for better assessment and prevention of damages to the state.

Stresses the importance of high-quality legislative impact assessments and early stakeholder engagement; uses questions to verify whether the audit findings have been reviewed and if there is a plan for improvement. This demonstrates a proactive and responsible approach aimed at raising the standard of legislative drafting and preparation.

The focus is on improving legislation and clarifying requirements and controls: it seeks comprehensive data and analysis regarding new legislation or the impact of draft bills. Specifically concerning motorsports, it emphasizes the need for clearer approvals and responsibilities stemming from the governing federation, as well as risk prevention. It aims to find mechanisms to ensure fairer and safer implementation and to prevent potential malicious practices.