By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

A speech delivered on the spot, critical, and strongly emotionally charged. It utilizes questions and extended lists to illustrate the missing strategy, along with sharp personal references (Kaja Kallas, Tiit Riisalo) and allusions to the actions of other political parties. The language used is highly attention-grabbing and, at times, employs a blog-like, yet fact-based, argumentation style, incorporating popular observations and original personal content.

The delivery is driven, confrontational, and rhetorically imitative. When speaking, he employs questions, examples, and irony, and sharply attacks written texts and decisions. The objective is to achieve influence through a strong critical tone and emotional appeal, while simultaneously striving to remain argumentative and grounded in facts. Furthermore, historical references and anecdotes of personal experience are utilized throughout the text.

The tone is formal, question-oriented, and analytical; the address is "Respected Presenter," and the style focuses on a specific statement and the discussion of its implementation, rather than the emotional frontline.

The rhetorical style is critical and comparative, employing emotional appeal and rhetorical questions. Consequently, a courteous greeting is included at the start of the address, yet the intonation closely aligns with a contentious debate, and the analogy of taking out a quick loan emphasizes the long-term damage. Specific figures and well-vetted arguments are utilized, lending the speech a formal, yet sharp edge.

The tone of the speech is combative and accusatory, characterized by frequent rhetorical questions and emotional delivery. Tropes such as “a sad day for democracy,” symbolic references, and strong accusations regarding the coalition’s intentions are employed. The text is formalized yet emotionally charged, and the strategic criticism of the speech, along with rhetorical questions directed at specific participants, lends it a demagogic color.

The tone is accusatory and direct, often grounded in facts and specific examples; utilizing powerful sections and citing specific, named cases (Bolt, Nortal, mRiik, Eesti 200). The texts combine emotional and logical approaches, focusing on scrutiny and accountability.