By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

Although critical, he/she has demonstrated a willingness to cooperate: pointing to the actions of opposition partners (the Social Democrats' support for the supplementary budget during the second and third readings) and attempting to use interpellations and parliamentary mechanisms to criticize the government. He/She acknowledges a certain element of coalition partnership, but maintains selective and sporadic criticism of the coalition, alongside presenting alternative solutions.

The strategy involves elements of both demands and cooperation: he confirms that the Centre Party submitted many substantive amendments, and some of these changes were accepted. At the same time, he stresses his willingness to cooperate going forward and advance their positions through the “second bill.” It seems he wants to find a broad-based solution and involve the coalition, but simultaneously continues to criticize the coalition's actions.

Cooperation among state institutions is noted as standard practice, but there are no specific descriptions regarding the methods of cooperation employed by either the coalition or the opposition; inter-institutional cooperation is emphasized as the norm.

Insufficient data

It shows some willingness to cooperate (e.g., noting that compromises could be reached regarding speeding violations) and refers to the necessity of cooperation concerning coalition bills. However, it also notes that the Centre Party's proposed amendments did not receive support, and the coalition does not appear ready for broader adjustment. References to "cooperation" and "attempts to defend" were used in the committee, but in practice, cooperation was successful only to a limited extent.

The tone is critical, yet it stresses the need for transparency and accountability, specifically referencing the coalition partners. However, cooperation or compromise is primarily framed through the demanding of questions and the receipt of answers; it poses questions rather than offering direct bipartisan decisions.