By Plenary Sessions: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
Total Sessions: 5
Fully Profiled: 5
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The focus is on the legal framework governing tax policy and budgetary implications; it seeks to consider and discuss a one-time additional bank levy as an alternative, and addresses the impact of taxation on the road network and consumers. It highlights that the current plan requires review and positions its stance within the context of legislative change.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
There are no specific legislative initiatives; the speaker acts more as a counterpoint to the discussion, calling for the submission of better measures to ensure mobility and preserve investments. The speaker demonstrates opposition to the main tax increases and emphasizes the need to present clear and feasible alternatives and to guide the public debate.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
The legislative framework for higher education funding and language policy; the need to develop a sustainable financial model and ensure funding of at least 1.5% of GDP is emphasized. Reference is made to the National Audit Office report as foundational data, and the importance of parliamentary debate concerning the draft legislation and the funding model is stressed.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The focus centers on the financing of the road maintenance plan and the increase or decrease of infrastructure costs. There is no specific bill or proponent involved, but the questions raised concern how the information hour (Question Time) is organized and how topics are restricted. Consequently, the core activity is discussion and oversight within the scope of parliamentary work, not the straightforward submission of a new law.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The primary focus: assessing the impact of the VAT exemption for accommodation establishments and considering its potential withdrawal or reduction; organizing inquiries and emphasizing the necessity of impact analyses and broad-based dialogue before amending the legislation. It indicates an intention to consider changes based on analyses and regional consequences.