By Plenary Sessions: Andrei Korobeinik

Lack of data. The speaker operates strictly in an oppositional, questioning role; there is no reference to cooperation or compromises.

He is working with his colleague Lauri Laats on the submission of the draft bill and refers to a similar previous initiative by EKRE. He calls on coalition members of parliament to support it, emphasizing that this is a proposal directed at the government, which allows for further modification. He expresses hope that the Social Democrats will break ranks and begin supporting the bill.

The speaker positively references "a good colleague," basing their own inquiry on the details of that colleague's question, thereby demonstrating a willingness to rely on the work of their peers. The direct collaboration style adopted with the counterparty is both inquisitive and demanding.

The speaker is acting on behalf of the Centre Faction and references other opposition colleagues (such as Henn Põlluaas and Vadim Belobrovtsev), supporting their positions and establishing a united opposition front. There is no indication whatsoever of a readiness to compromise with the coalition; instead, other Riigikogu members are called upon not to support the budget. Collaboration is viewed as necessary within the opposition to guarantee the budget's rejection.

The speaker represents the views of the Center Party faction and refers to the draft legislation submitted by the faction aimed at improving transparency. Cooperation with the government is absent, as there is a proposal to reject the bill, yet concern is expressed regarding the procedural rights of other opposition factions (EKRE).

The speaker is offering their knowledge on the topic of artificial intelligence, which indicates a readiness to share their expertise. Although the current interaction is focused on correction and asking questions, the goal is to help identify the true causes of the problem.