By Plenary Sessions: Andrei Korobeinik
Total Sessions: 56
Fully Profiled: 56
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
Cooperation is evident within the faction, specifically when submitting decisions and interpellations "on behalf of the Centre Faction." They reference collaboration with colleagues (e.g., Aivar Kokk, Aleksei Jevgrafov) and support the Chancellor of Justice's proposals for mitigating the car tax. While open to substantive cooperation, they become very rigid and protesting if they feel their rights as a member of the Riigikogu have been violated, demanding intervention from the Parliament's Board.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker mentions defending the proposals of the Social Democratic faction in the committee, which indicates selective cooperation with opposition partners regarding social issues. Communication with the coalition, however, remains entirely confrontational, as they criticize the Reform Party, Eesti 200, and the Social Democrats for increasing the number of officials.
2025-06-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker recognizes the thorough work done by colleague Aivar Kokk on the draft legislation, even though he does not participate in the committee. There is no apparent willingness to compromise with the governing coalition; instead, the focus is placed on the necessity of restoring the role of parliament and ensuring transparent lawmaking. It is mentioned that the speaker and Aivar Kokk are not welcome in the Reform Party’s backroom.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker is acting on behalf of the Centre Faction, presenting a motion to suspend proceedings authorized by the faction, which indicates strong cooperation within the faction. Simultaneously, the speaker noted a positive common ground with colleagues Läänemets and Kiik regarding their support for progressive income tax, hinting at potential issue-based cooperation.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker is pragmatic, seeking clarity on potential cooperation by asking the bill's presenter whether the matter has been discussed with colleagues in the opposition. Specifically, they are investigating whether the Social Democrats' votes can be secured as support, despite the sharp criticism directed at them.
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
There are no direct references to current cross-party activity concerning cooperation. However, the Social Democrats are criticized for voting down the Centre Faction's earlier proposal (to raise the subsistence level).
2025-05-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is intra-factional, as the Centre Faction proposes rejecting the bill. Former coalition partners (the Social Democrats) are being criticized for their involvement in drafting the taxation plan. No openness to compromise with the government is being shown.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
There is little data regarding the style of cooperation, but the speaker positively references the Center Party government’s previous infrastructure projects and plans (for 2030), which demonstrates support for the earlier political direction. He/She also refers to Reform Party MPs who have drawn attention to the decline in traffic safety, attempting to find common ground in the criticism.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The style of cooperation is pragmatic, seeking support for the rejection of the bill both from the opposition (the Social Democrats, whose eyes have been opened) and from reasonable members within the coalition. Hope is expressed that there are also people in the Reform Party who fundamentally do not support the bill. Direct cooperation or the formation of coalitions is not described.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker represents the Centre Party parliamentary group and is cooperating within the group on submitting the motion to suspend proceedings. He/She is seeking support from other Riigikogu members, directly appealing to the Social Democrats to "find the courage this time" to support the proposal, referencing previous unsuccessful collaboration. This cooperation is aimed at opposition activity.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
There is no direct data regarding the style of cooperation, but the speaker emphasizes the partisan nature of the coalition negotiations and the removal of the Social Democrats from the process. The speaker asks the Reform Party and Eesti 200 whether they will revoke the unfavorable initiative in the absence of the Social Democrats.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
Insufficient data.
2025-04-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is centered internally (the Center Party), highlighting the party's own actions when making proposals and taking legal steps. The lack of cooperation with the coalition is clear, as the coalition not only failed to support the proposals, but also argued they were insincere and blocked the vote.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is not enough data.
2025-02-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker emphasizes the Center Party's commitment to fulfilling its promises and maintaining consistency, contrasting this with the inaction of its coalition partners. A willingness to cooperate is lacking because the coalition’s current policy is diametrically opposed to the Center Party’s objectives. He/She also criticizes former party colleagues who have joined the SDE, suggesting that they have lost their political competence.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The style of collaboration is pragmatic and opposition-focused, supporting the initiative of a fellow colleague (Peeter Tali) to hold a no-confidence vote against the prime minister, even though the initiator's electoral base is unconventional. The objective of this cooperation is to hold the government accountable.
2025-02-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The speaker refers to colleagues (Lauri Laats, Jaak Valge) and the arguments they presented, which indicates cooperation within the opposition when putting forward shared critical positions. There is no information regarding any openness to compromise or cross-party cooperation with the ruling coalition.
2025-01-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The cooperation style is professional and direct, communicating with the minister in a question-and-answer format. The speaker thanks the minister (Liisa-Ly) for the thorough answers, which indicates a polite exchange, while simultaneously maintaining a strongly critical stance regarding the outcomes of the projects.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The cooperation style is direct and questioning, involving addressing colleagues by name (Karmen, Toomas) to obtain explanations and challenge their viewpoints. Although critical of the government, they treat the session chair constructively and seek to understand the coalition's internal disagreements concerning the Tallinn Hospital project.
2024-12-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker is backing the draft legislation put forward by their colleague (Lauri Laats) and is actively seeking support from opposition factions, specifically Isamaa. They emphasize the point that even a minor step forward is preferable to doing nothing at all. The speaker urges coalition members to attend the chamber and vote in favor of the bill, noting the previous unsuccessful effort to tie their salaries directly to their attendance at sittings.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker positively references the solutions proposed by the Centre Party (a bank tax, reduction of the public sector), indicating a political willingness to cooperate with that opposition party. Seeking cooperation or compromise with the government is not evident, given that the government's actions are sharply criticized.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The current style of cooperation is rather confrontational, posing pointed questions both to coalition colleagues (Aivar, Annely) and to the presiding officer of the session. Reference is made to previous failed cooperation, where the coalition did not support the draft bill proposed by the speaker's faction, which would have helped prevent the budget deficit.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
The speaker commends the presiding officer for improving the practice of intervening in speeches, thereby showing a willingness to notice and praise positive developments. There is no information available regarding direct cooperation or the seeking of compromises with other political parties, although there is an indirect reference to the special treatment afforded to Isamaa.
2024-11-07
15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The speaker is seeking broad support for their bill, emphasizing that every vote is crucial and asking all members of parliament to press the green button. Regarding procedural issues, they offer constructive yet ironic solutions (e.g., suggesting the oldest committee member be appointed as rapporteur) to ensure the progress of the Riigikogu's work.
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker operates strictly within the parliament's rules of procedure, posing questions to ministers and referencing discussions previously held in the Riigikogu. There is no information regarding inter-party cooperation or a willingness to compromise.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
Lack of data. The speaker operates strictly in an oppositional, questioning role; there is no reference to cooperation or compromises.
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
He is working with his colleague Lauri Laats on the submission of the draft bill and refers to a similar previous initiative by EKRE. He calls on coalition members of parliament to support it, emphasizing that this is a proposal directed at the government, which allows for further modification. He expresses hope that the Social Democrats will break ranks and begin supporting the bill.
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker positively references "a good colleague," basing their own inquiry on the details of that colleague's question, thereby demonstrating a willingness to rely on the work of their peers. The direct collaboration style adopted with the counterparty is both inquisitive and demanding.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker is acting on behalf of the Centre Faction and references other opposition colleagues (such as Henn Põlluaas and Vadim Belobrovtsev), supporting their positions and establishing a united opposition front. There is no indication whatsoever of a readiness to compromise with the coalition; instead, other Riigikogu members are called upon not to support the budget. Collaboration is viewed as necessary within the opposition to guarantee the budget's rejection.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker represents the views of the Center Party faction and refers to the draft legislation submitted by the faction aimed at improving transparency. Cooperation with the government is absent, as there is a proposal to reject the bill, yet concern is expressed regarding the procedural rights of other opposition factions (EKRE).
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker is offering their knowledge on the topic of artificial intelligence, which indicates a readiness to share their expertise. Although the current interaction is focused on correction and asking questions, the goal is to help identify the true causes of the problem.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The current style of engagement in this context is confrontational and uncompromising toward the government. A positive reference is made to the Center Party’s previous actions regarding the increase of the subsistence benefit, which suggests a willingness to cooperate with forces that share similar social priorities. There is no mention of current cooperation with the ruling coalition.
2024-09-24
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
Insufficient data
2024-07-29
The 15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu.
There is not enough data.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
Cooperation is evident within the opposition, referencing other colleagues (Koka, Martin Helme) and the Center Faction's joint appeal to the court. They are fully opposed to the coalition but emphasize external sources of opposition, such as the Association of Cities and Municipalities and the Supreme Court, to support their position.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
A collaborative style is absent because the speech is aimed at public correction and calling the opposing side's positions into question. There are no references to compromise or cross-party cooperation; rather, clear political dividing lines are emphasized.
2024-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, extra plenary sitting
The speaker is demonstrating procedural solidarity with the Isamaa faction by criticizing the commission's double standards and the limitation placed on their proposed amendments. No willingness to compromise with the coalition has been expressed, as the supplementary budget is deemed irreparable.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The Center Faction has submitted substantive amendments (e.g., car tax concessions), but these have been rejected by the coalition, indicating a lack of cooperation. Although the faction supports one minor bill (concerning debt bondage), it emphasizes that this does not constitute support for the government, but is merely "a small step in the right direction."
2024-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The style of cooperation in this context is notably absent and confrontational, focusing primarily on refuting the claims made by coalition partners (especially the Social Democrats). While there is a reference to Isamaa's alternative budget, there are no direct mentions of cross-factional collaboration or a willingness to compromise.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker demonstrates cooperation within their faction (referencing the Centre Faction's amendments) and seeks to defend the deputy's right to vote on substantive, non-mutually exclusive amendments. He/she is uncompromising toward the governing coalition, calling for the rejection of the draft legislation and the termination of the government's work.
2024-06-04
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is evident internally within the faction, noting that the Centre Faction and apparently some other factions do not support the draft bill. There is no information regarding cooperation or willingness to compromise with the coalition parties; the style is purely confrontational.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
The collaborative approach emphasizes the necessity of broader involvement in policy formulation, requiring that the debate extend beyond the inner circle of Eesti 200 to include coalition partners and the opposition in the Riigikogu. This signals a demand for more transparent and inclusive policy-making.
2024-05-30
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
There is a lack of openness regarding cooperation; instead, there is sharp criticism directed at the slow pace and inability of the coalition partners (Eesti 200) to make decisions, even after having been in the coalition for a long time. It is emphasized that the coalition is incapable of making sensible decisions.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The representative acts on behalf of the Centre Party faction, presenting their proposals and speaking positively about their fellow faction members. They are open to supporting sound proposals (such as those regarding fruits and vegetables), but their interaction with the coalition is confrontational. As a representative of the opposition, they feel unfairly treated and ignored, which hinders cooperation.
2024-05-28
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
Data is lacking regarding current cooperation or willingness to compromise. The speaker emphasizes the positive results achieved during the Centre Party-led government via extraordinary pension increases, referring to this as the only way to reduce the divide.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
The style of cooperation is pragmatic, seeking support from the opposition (by referencing similarities with the EKRE draft bill) and stressing the need for joint decisions to rescue the economy. Hope is expressed that Eesti 200 might represent the voice of common sense within the government, although there is general skepticism regarding the coalition partners.
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
Cooperation with other factions is not mentioned, but the speaker addresses the presiding officer of the session for advice, showing a readiness to accept procedural assistance. To back up the argument, previous critical viewpoints from members of the opposition party (the Reform Party)—Ansip and Lauri—are used to demonstrate the government's internal inconsistency.
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker demonstrates collaboration with a member of their faction (laughing alongside Lauri Laats) and strategically leverages the internal criticism within the Reform Party (Ansip's interviews) to bolster their opposition position. There is absolutely no indication of any willingness to compromise with the government.
2024-03-13
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
Insufficient data.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker focuses primarily on criticizing the government and the debate. They acknowledge the validity of colleague Lauri Laats's question, which indicates support and similar viewpoints within the opposition. Cross-party cooperation is not evident from the speeches.
2024-02-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The need for a joint and resolute condemnation in the Riigikogu chamber is emphasized, and all states are called upon for international cooperation to bring the children home. Estonia's role in consolidating allies is highlighted, referencing a foreign policy oriented toward cooperation.
2024-02-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The collaborative style is formal and substantive, expressing a desire to hold a meaningful discussion with the Minister, along with gratitude that the inquiry finally took place. The speaker is open to sharing information and requests that the Minister share any studies available to the Ministry.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Speaking on behalf of the Centre Faction, the orator proposes the rejection of the draft bill and stresses the unity of the opposition. He attempts to pressure the coalition's smaller partners ("väiksemad partnerid") to take a stand against the Reform Party's policies, hoping that members within the coalition will also support the motion to reject the bill. He criticizes the government for dismissing a sound opposition proposal (the universal service amendment) solely on the grounds that it originated from the opposition.
2024-02-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
Internationally, the speaker advocates for increasing Estonia's role as a mediator in mobilizing support for Ukraine and as a provider of expert assistance to Georgia and Moldova in the field of e-governance. He/She views Estonia as a top-tier player leading the charge on international tax reform. Data regarding domestic inter-party cooperation is unavailable.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
Lack of data