By Months: Andrei Korobeinik
Total Months: 8
Fully Profiled: 8
11.2025
1 Speeches
The style of the speech is formal and direct, addressing the members of the Riigikogu. The argumentation is primarily logical and procedural, focusing on why the existing norm is not functional. The conclusion expresses hope and includes a call to support the draft bill.
09.2025
11 Speeches
The rhetorical style is critical, frustrated, and at times combative, particularly concerning the board's actions, which are described as "weird and pointless." The speaker employs powerful metaphors such as "political steamroller" and directs rhetorical questions at colleagues to highlight procedural injustice.
06.2025
31 Speeches
The rhetorical style is highly combative, critical, and sharp, employing strong accusations of lying, incompetence, and hypocrisy. The speaker frequently uses emotional and figurative language (such as "Orwell's book," "demented squirrel," and "the economy's funeral") and urgently demands the restoration of parliamentary culture and transparency. They pose questions, the lack of response to which they interpret as the presenter deliberately evading the issue.
05.2025
19 Speeches
The rhetorical style is highly combative and accusatory, focusing on the hypocrisy and lies of opponents, particularly the Social Democrats and the Reform Party. Strong emotional appeals are employed, highlighting social inequality and government incompetence, alongside ironic references (such as Vladimir Putin’s alleged role in leading the Estonian government). The style is direct and repetitive, constantly emphasizing the negative impact of tax hikes.
04.2025
10 Speeches
The speaker’s style is predominantly critical, sharp, and combative, aimed particularly at the coalition, which is accused of incompetence and deceiving voters. He employs both logical appeals (referencing constitutional articles and economic statistics) and emotional expressions (labeling the communication surrounding the legislation as "deception of the people" and the long-term plan a "farce"). The tone is urgent, stressing that the failed law must be corrected immediately.
03.2025
6 Speeches
The rhetorical style is sharp, demanding, and critical, emphasizing the gravity and illegality of the situation. The speaker employs logical and procedural arguments, often posing rhetorical questions to challenge the board's knowledge and passivity. He uses figurative language, such as the question of whether the statute book can be "sent to the recycling bin with a clear conscience."
02.2025
40 Speeches
The speaker’s rhetorical style is sharp, sarcastic, and highly confrontational, utilizing powerful metaphors ("tax orgy," "sacred cow," "collective Putin"). He intersperses statistical data with emotional and politically charged accusations, faulting opponents for incompetence and hypocrisy. The speaker repeatedly employs personal addresses and irony to criticize the Prime Minister’s "faith" as the underpinning of economic policy.
01.2025
12 Speeches
The style is predominantly combative, sharp, and accusatory, often employing rhetorical questions and irony (e.g., comparing the economic recession to Haiti). The speaker emphasizes logical arguments (the negative impact of sick people working on GDP, the violation of procedural rules), but delivers them with emotional intensity, especially when targeting the coalition and the Riigikogu Board. He uses direct addresses and demands clarification regarding the decision-making processes.