By Plenary Sessions: Andrei Korobeinik

The style is highly combative, critical, and deeply ironic, directly accusing the government of outright lying and incompetence. It employs powerful imagery (such as "riders of the apocalypse") and heavy sarcasm (for instance, when commenting on the finance minister's resignation). While the arguments presented are logical (specifically, the link between tax hikes and economic recession), they are delivered with intense emotional fervor, underscoring the detrimental nature of the government's policies.

The style is sharply critical, accusatory, and urgent, especially concerning the government's priorities and choices. The speaker uses quotes and references to press releases to call into question the integrity of the Prime Minister and the Reform Party, asking directly whether the Mayor of Pärnu was deceived. Logical arguments (budget figures, defense capability) are mixed with emotional accusations, such as the detrimental effect of the government's choices on the Estonian population.

The rhetorical style is highly combative, accusatory, and emotional, employing strong metaphors such as "attacks" and "demolition." The appeals are directed at justice and common sense, urging colleagues to give the draft bill the "red light." The tone is direct and critical toward both the current and the previous coalition.

The rhetorical style is highly combative, accusatory, and expresses moral indignation, specifically targeting the Social Democratic Party, whom they label as hypocrites. Repeated emotional appeals are employed, stressing that the government is "going after the weakest." The style is direct and utilizes rhetorical questions ("Is a politician truly allowed to lie?") to discredit the actions of the opponents.

The rhetorical style is sharply critical and confrontational, utilizing historical references (Andrus Ansip) and statistics to underscore the worsening economic situation. The speaker employs an emotional appeal, focusing on the livelihood of vulnerable groups to highlight the injustice of the policy.