By Plenary Sessions: Andrei Korobeinik

The main opponents are the Reform Party and the Eesti 200 government, who are accused of destroying the economy and lying to the public regarding tax hikes. The criticism is fierce and personalized, specifically targeting Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, who is accused of incompetence and justifying falsehoods. Compromise is ruled out, as the Centre Faction proposes rejecting the draft bill.

The main adversaries are the Reform Party, the Prime Minister, and Kristen Michal, who are sharply criticized for canceling infrastructure projects and their choice of budget priorities. The speaker accuses the government of favoring the wealthy and using the "Putin narrative" to justify abandoning the development of crucial projects. The criticism is intense and politically charged, calling into question the morality and strategic soundness of the government’s decisions.

The primary opponents are the Reform Party and Eesti 200, who stand accused of deliberately targeting the vulnerable and dismantling the Estonian labor market. The criticism is intense and policy-based, extending even to the condemnation of earlier social cuts made by the former coalition (the Social Democrats). No willingness to compromise has been expressed; instead, they are demanding the outright rejection of the draft legislation.

The primary opponent is the Social Democratic Party, which stands accused of "the most shocking hypocrisy" and stripping the weakest of their rights while serving in government. The criticism is intense, targeting both specific political decisions (such as the elimination of health insurance and the introduction of the car tax) and the betrayal of the party's core values. The tax policy of the ruling coalition (the Reform Party, Estonia 200) is also being challenged. Compromise is out of the question, as the complete termination of the draft bill is being demanded.

The speaker is strongly opposed to the social policy changes proposed by the Reform Party and Eesti 200 related to unemployment insurance. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the intention to cut unemployment benefits for single mothers, seasonal workers, and young people.