By Plenary Sessions: Andrei Korobeinik

The political position is fiercely opposed to the economic policy of the current government (the Reform Party and Eesti 200), highlighting Estonia's three consecutive years ranking dead last in EU economic indicators. The speaker vehemently rejects tax increases during the crisis and the government’s decision to make the temporary security tax permanent, leveling accusations of incompetence and outright lying to the public. The overall framework is results-oriented, focusing heavily on the destruction of the economy and the government's complete failure to deliver.

The political position centers on strong support for upgrading the Via Baltica to four lanes and backing other major infrastructure projects, such as the Haapsalu railway and the Tallinn Hospital, while criticizing the cancellation of the Reform Party’s previous plans. The speaker stresses that infrastructure investments are critically important for jump-starting the economy and are vital for national defense. The policy framing is primarily results-oriented, accusing the government of breaking promises and contributing to a decline in road safety.

The political stance is strongly oppositional, centered on criticizing the actions of the government (the Reform Party and Eesti 200), which are seen as targeting vulnerable societal groups. The primary issues are cuts to social benefits and tax policy changes (specifically the motor vehicle tax and the income taxation of pensions). This is a values-driven position, stressing that the government lacks the popular mandate required to attack the Estonian people and dismantle the labor market.

The political position is strongly opposed to the government’s social and tax policies, which are viewed as exacerbating inequality. Particular emphasis is placed on the decline in the purchasing power of the subsistence benefit and the removal of health insurance and unemployment benefits from vulnerable groups (single mothers, people with special needs). This position is value-based, centered on solidarity and the protection of the weakest, and demands that the legislative process for the bill be terminated. The policy is framed by highlighting the failure and hypocrisy of the government’s actions (including those of the social democrats).

The political stance is strongly critical of the government’s economic performance, stressing that the prosperity of the common person has fallen back to the level seen seven years ago. The primary focus is on social welfare and the ability to make ends meet, contrasting the well-being of politicians with the situation faced by ordinary citizens. The speaker demands the reversal of social benefit cuts affecting vulnerable groups.