By Months: Andrei Korobeinik

The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the structure of the political system and norms of representation, clearly distinguishing the nationwide representative function of the Riigikogu from the specific tasks of the local council. He/She is familiar with the legislative procedure, having submitted a corresponding draft bill.

The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the Riigikogu's internal procedures and agenda formation, referencing the committee's work, the role of the Board, and the timeline for handling the draft legislation. They are familiar with the specifics of internal parliamentary communication, for instance, by mentioning the commitment to call the rapporteur.

The speaker demonstrates detailed expertise in state finance, budget transparency, and tax policy, referencing specific figures (0.5 billion, the subsistence level). They also possess technical knowledge regarding data protection and legislation, criticizing artificial intelligence (the AI Act) and the use of algorithms in the work of the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU). Furthermore, they are demanding explanations concerning the classification of unused transferable balances carried over by ministries.

The expert knowledge is apparent in the specifics of social policy and labor market legislation, citing the drop in the purchasing power of subsistence benefits and the growing administrative burden on local municipalities. Furthermore, they demonstrate expertise regarding the scheduling and financing of infrastructure development (Via Baltica, Rail Baltic), using EU statistics and budget figures within the context of the economic crisis.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in both fiscal policy (as a member of the Finance Committee, discussing tax structure and the impact of registration fees) and the digital and justice sectors. He uses concrete data, referencing Estonia’s recession (the worst in the EU for three consecutive years), the growth in the number of state employees (10,000), and the length of court proceedings (civil proceedings have increased by a quarter). Furthermore, he is well-versed in specific IT topics, such as the implementation of artificial intelligence in the Unemployment Insurance Fund (Töötukassa) and issues concerning the eesti.ee environment.

The speaker demonstrates thorough knowledge of the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act, as well as the working procedures of the committees. He/She is particularly authoritative concerning the convening of Finance Committee sessions, the legality of decisions, and the validity of the minutes. He/She emphasizes strict adherence to the law and written rules, as opposed to arbitrary decisions made by the board.

The speaker demonstrates strong expertise in economic and tax policy, utilizing specific data regarding inflation, bank profits, and state budget expenditures (e.g., 50 million allocated for subsistence benefits versus over a billion in bank profits). They are capable of comparing Estonia's economic recession with the European Union average and analyzing the structural impacts of the bank tax, citing the experiences of Lithuania and Latvia. Furthermore, they are familiar with the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) rules of procedure and procedural matters (changing the agenda, extending the session).

The speaker demonstrates expertise in Riigikogu procedural matters (changing the agenda, the board's arbitrariness) and topics related to the development of the e-state. They use technical details, referencing mobile application ratings (2.6/5), AI investments in the EU, and the design of the Ukrainian e-application (Diia). They also draw on historical parallels (Roosevelt) in the context of economic revitalization.