By Months: Andrei Korobeinik

The most important topic is the structure and pipeline for political representation. The speaker is strongly opposed to the dual mandate principle, arguing that it hinders the development of young politicians and creates a conflict of interest between members of the Riigikogu and local councils. This is a policy- and value-based framework that emphasizes the clear separation of representative functions.

The political position strongly focuses on legislative procedure and agenda setting. The speaker vehemently opposes the decision by the Riigikogu Board to alter the committee's consensus proposal regarding scheduling the agenda item for Tuesday. He criticizes the Board's actions as launching a "political steamroller," emphasizing the necessity of institutional integrity and adherence to democratic processes.

The political stance is fiercely oppositional, focusing on the failure of the governing coalition’s (Reform Party, SDE, E200) economic policy, particularly the three-year recession. The main issues are budget opacity and social inequality, where tax hikes are funding tax breaks for the wealthy. Ten years of economic development have been lost, which is why the political framework is strongly results-oriented and values-driven.

The political stance is strongly oppositional, focusing on sharp criticism of the policies enacted by the current government (Reform Party, Estonia 200) and the former coalition partner (Social Democrats)—policies which allegedly increase inequality and damage the economy. Key issues include social welfare, the cutting of unemployment benefits, and the condemnation of halting infrastructure development (Via Baltica). The position is heavily performance-based, highlighting Estonia's economic recession within the European Union and the government's incompetence.

The speaker, representing the Centre Party, is a fierce opponent of the car tax, labeling it grossly unfair and unconstitutional, particularly concerning people with disabilities and large families. Their political stance is strongly performance-driven, criticizing the government's incompetence amid the economic downturn and the lack of transparency in the legislative process. They emphasize the necessity of amending the law and promise to abolish the tax should the Centre Party come to power.

The political focus is on the strict adherence to the parliament's rules of procedure and procedural regulations, particularly concerning the legality of the Finance Committee's sessions. The speaker expresses deep concern and strong opposition regarding the governing body's passivity and the alleged "disorder." Regarding specific policy, emphasis is placed on the continued processing of decisions aimed at revoking the car tax. The overall framing is highly procedural and oriented toward the functionality of the institution.

The most prominent topics are Estonia's economic recession and the coalition's tax policy. The speaker is strongly opposed to the economic policy of the Reform Party-led government, emphasizing that it has led Estonia to the second place globally, after Haiti, in terms of the duration of the economic downturn. The political stance is results-oriented, accusing the government of acting based on "faith" rather than concrete goals. The main goal is reducing social inequality and stimulating the economy through a bank tax.

The speaker positions himself as a sharp critic of the governing coalition (Reform Party, SDE, Eesti 200), focusing on their inability to manage the economy and implement crucial projects. Key themes include the economic recession, the cancellation of major infrastructure and healthcare projects (the Tallinn Hospital), and the decline in the reputation of the e-state. The criticism is strongly results-oriented, accusing the Reform Party of driving the country into an economic hole and calling Kristen Michal "Roosevelt in reverse."