By Plenary Sessions: Andrei Korobeinik

The speaker demonstrates expertise on the topics of public finance, tax policy, and budget transparency. Specific data (half a billion per year) and technical terms such as "elimination of the tax hump" and "transferable unused balances in ministries" are used. It is emphasized that the secrecy surrounding ministerial spending hinders the effective management of public finance.

The speaker demonstrates profound expertise in data protection, artificial intelligence regulation, and legislative procedures. Specific terminology is employed, including "depseudonymization," "algorithm," "artificial intelligence," and "high-risk system," with explicit reference to the European Union's AI Act. Detailed comparisons are drawn between the data disclosure practices of the Financial Intelligence Unit (RAB) and the prosecutor's office, highlighting deficiencies in the current legislation.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in tax policy and budgetary matters, detailing the progressive income tax, simplified taxation of business income, and the financial cost of tax incentives (exceeding half a billion annually). Specific legislative terminology is employed (draft bill, motion to reject/suspend proceedings, second reading).

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of local government regulations and the specifics of urban planning, citing the placement of benches and the scooter issue in Tallinn as examples. He uses specific, albeit anecdotal, examples (benches in the middle of the highway) to illustrate the poor quality of city governance.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the fields of macroeconomics and fiscal policy, citing quarterly economic growth data, the cost of tax wedges, and supplementary budget instruments. The arguments include criticism leveled at institutions (the Fiscal Council, the Chancellor of Justice) concerning budgetary transparency. Furthermore, the economic situation in Lithuania is used for comparison.