By Plenary Sessions: Andrei Korobeinik

The style is courteous and appreciative, beginning with thanks for the presentation ("a very thorough presentation"). However, the speaker is also insistent and demanding, repeating a question that was previously left unanswered to ensure a complete response. The questioning employs a direct, fact-driven approach, focusing on the logical connection between the representative's actions and the voters' counsel.

The rhetorical style is sharply aggressive and critical, employing sarcasm (for instance, when describing the behavior of the Social Democrats) and powerful metaphors ("faith," "poodles"). The speaker relies on logical arguments and data, but weaves these together with emotional appeals, highlighting the suffering of the Estonian people and the severity of the economic downturn. He uses illustrative analogies (the cafe becoming a warehouse, Khrushchev and corn) to explain the failure of the Reform Party's policies.

The style is sharp, critical, and hostile, particularly toward the foreign minister, who is accused of avoiding a direct response and engaging in undemocratic behavior. Direct yes-no questions and strong emotional appeals are employed while defending voters against being labeled.

The rhetorical style is highly combative, critical, and ironic, employing strong metaphors such as "tax orgy" and "sacred cow" in the context of the bank tax. The speaker utilizes emotional appeals, comparing the economic damage caused by the government to a "collective Putin," while simultaneously grounding these claims with statistical data. The tone is sharp, aiming to undermine the government's credibility.