By Months: Aivar Kokk
Total Months: 11
Fully Profiled: 11
12.2024
32 Speeches
The speaker employs emotional and combative rhetoric, frequently using phrases such as "it is sad," "it is embarrassing to listen to," and "nightmare." The style is direct and confrontational, combining fact-based arguments with powerful emotional appeals. They often utilize irony and sarcasm, particularly when addressing coalition partners, and frequently conclude their speeches with a defiant tone or a promise concerning future decisions.
11.2024
49 Speeches
It employs emotional and combative rhetoric, combining it with fact-based arguments. The tone is often critical and laced with irony, employing phrases like "for heaven's sake" and "well, nothing can be done about it." The approach is direct and confrontational, especially when criticizing government policy. It relies on both emotional appeals and detailed numerical data.
10.2024
46 Speeches
They use a direct, confrontational style, combining fact-based arguments with emotional assessments. The rhetoric is often critical and tinged with irony, using phrases like ("I laugh," "that's just impossible/unacceptable"). There is a strong reliance on specific numbers and comparisons, with colloquial expressions used occasionally for clarity.
09.2024
8 Speeches
Uses a formally polite yet critical tone, starting speeches with traditional addresses. It relies on facts and figures, posing rhetorical questions regarding the sensibility of government policy. The style is direct and concrete, avoiding emotional statements, but clearly emphasizing political contradictions.
07.2024
12 Speeches
Emotional and combative rhetoric that combines fact-based arguments with strong judgments ("nightmare," "shameful," "ridiculous bill"). It repeatedly uses specific examples and figures to support its positions. The rhetoric is directly confrontational towards the government but attempts to create an emotional connection with voters through everyday life examples (children in school, problems in rural areas).
06.2024
24 Speeches
The speaker employs an emotional and combative tone, often dramatizing the situation ("a mourning flag on Midsummer's Day," "people are being killed"). He/She combines factual data with emotional appeals, repeatedly using rhetorical questions and leveling direct accusations against the government. The style is straightforward and confrontational, especially toward coalition politicians.
05.2024
13 Speeches
They employ emotional and confrontational rhetoric, directly accusing ministers of lying. They draw upon personal experiences as a local government leader and use concrete examples to bolster their argument. They frequently express shame and embarrassment regarding the government's decisions, utilizing dramatic language such as "I have no words" and "I am ashamed to be a member of the Riigikogu."
04.2024
36 Speeches
The speaker employs emotional and confrontational rhetoric, accusing the government of lying and using "steamrolling tactics." The style is direct and highly critical, often utilizing irony and sarcasm. The arguments rely on concrete figures and facts, but they are delivered in emotionally charged language, highlighting the government's failures.
03.2024
31 Speeches
The speaker employs direct and emotional rhetoric, often blending fact-based arguments with personal experiences and practical examples. The style is confrontational toward the government but constructive when offering alternatives. The speaker repeatedly uses rhetorical questions and issues direct challenges to ministers to take specific steps.
02.2024
11 Speeches
The tone is extremely confrontational and emotional, utilizing direct accusations ("Are you lying?" "You are lying yet again!"). The rhetoric is populist, emphasizing the suffering of ordinary people and entrepreneurs caused by government policy. It frequently employs colloquialisms ("that's the crux of the matter," "steamrolling over") and personal attacks, combining them with factual data.
01.2024
24 Speeches
Employs emotional and confrontational rhetoric, calling the government's decisions "stupid" and "madness." They rely heavily on personal experience and concrete examples, particularly incidents involving the Jõgeva municipality. The speaking tone is passionate and accusatory, often interrupting their train of thought with additional examples or emotional exclamations.