By Plenary Sessions: Aivar Kokk

The speaker employs emotional and combative rhetoric, labeling the draft bill "criminal" and accusing opponents of "lying." The style is personal and passionate, utilizing direct addresses ("I can boldly look you in the eye") and specific examples of domestic responsibilities (mowing the lawn, shoveling snow). The speaker combines emotional appeals with factual arguments, thereby creating a powerful rhetorical impact.

An emotional and confrontational style, utilizing sharp expressions such as "criminal law" and "lied five times." It combines factual arguments with dramatic imagery (people "will be killed off," "a mourning flag on Midsummer's Day"). The important message is repeated multiple times for emphasis, and rhetorical questions are used to increase impact.

The speaker employs emotional and combative rhetoric, combining it with concrete data. He uses figurative language ("taxes springing up like mushrooms after the rain") and personal attacks ("you really stepped in it"). The style is direct and populist, concluding with a clear electoral appeal to vote for Isamaa.