By Plenary Sessions: Aivar Kokk
Total Sessions: 72
Fully Profiled: 72
2025-10-13
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The tone is predominantly critical, demanding, and blunt, repeatedly expressing distrust regarding the competence of the minister and the government ("I regret, esteemed minister, that you are unable to answer the questions"). It employs numerous rhetorical questions and direct accusations of scheming and non-transparent distribution of funds ("black hole"). The style is a blend of logical appeal (specific figures and budget structure) and emotional appeal (the closure of regional institutions).
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The tone is extremely combative, critical, and accusatory, employing strong emotional appeals and blunt language (e.g., "lies," "shame on you," "dear friends/pals"). The rhetoric centers on highlighting the government's injustice and incompetence, contrasting the resources available to the wealthy with the plight of lower-income individuals. The style is direct and passionate, underscoring the social and economic impact of political decisions.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The style is critical and direct, beginning with a sharp accusation aimed at the government concerning the debt burden. It utilizes both logical appeals (specific budgetary issues) and a personal juxtaposition with the minister's previous recommendations on saving ("buy canned goods"). The tone is formal, yet it contains a sharp political attack.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The tone is predominantly combative, critical, and accusatory, particularly regarding the government's economic competence and integrity. It emphasizes logical appeals, relying on facts, transcripts, and the text of the explanatory memorandum, but also employs emotional language ("hostile bill"). It repeatedly reiterates its party's clear positions and promises.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
They employ a direct and emotional speaking style, frequently opening with expressions such as "For heaven's sake" or "I sincerely mean it." Personal experiences are combined with technical details to underscore their arguments. The tone is critical and occasionally sarcastic, particularly concerning government decisions, yet they maintain a constructive approach when offering proposals.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
They employ a direct and confrontational style, particularly when criticizing the government. The rhetoric is highly emotional, utilizing phrases such as "cynical sowing of insecurity" and "shockingly large car tax." It often relies on concrete examples (a family with six children, a child in a wheelchair) to maximize emotional impact. The overall style is direct and accusatory, especially when addressing procedural violations.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Employs emotionally charged and direct language ("shameful budget," "tax festival," "anti-people tax"). It combines fact-based arguments with specific real-life examples (a family with six children, a parent of a child in a wheelchair). The rhetoric is clearly confrontational, yet it relies on numerical data and comparisons.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaking style is emotional and direct, employing sharp expressions like "complete madness" and "silly talk." The speaker combines emotional assessments with detailed numerical arguments, uses personal examples (their family's waste sorting, business experience) and rhetorical questions. The tone is distinctly confrontational and critical.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The text employs an emotional and combative tone, labeling the current tax policy as "predatory" and "insane." It relies heavily on personal experiences and concrete examples, often using rhetorical questions and direct challenges aimed at coalition politicians. The style is straightforward and populist, emphasizing the concerns of ordinary people.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
He/She employs an emotional and combative tone, combining this with concrete figures and facts. The rhetoric is direct and highly critical, including personal references ("a man gives his word and a man takes his word back") and irony regarding the government's promises. Speeches are structured logically, starting with a description of the problem and concluding with specific proposals.
2025-05-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing.
Adopting a direct and confrontational approach, the speaker addresses the Prime Minister using the informal "you" (T-form) and demands concrete answers. The rhetoric is emotionally charged, employing phrases like "demagoguery" and "you state with integrity," yet it remains simultaneously grounded in facts and figures.
2025-05-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
It uses direct and confrontational rhetoric, accusing the opposing side of lying ("that lie that is coming out of your mouth today"). It relies on facts and numerical argumentation, but combines this with emotional assessments ("criminal bill," "absurd"). Speeches often conclude with categorical statements ("No to tax hikes! Let's stop this mess!").
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Uses emotional and confrontational rhetoric, combining it with fact-based arguments. The approach is straightforward and critical, employing figurative language ("take the electricity away from your home for a week") and irony ("the great victory of the Reform Party"). It relies on both technical argumentation and emotional influence, emphasizing the interests of the public and businesses.
2025-04-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
They employ an emotional and personal approach, repeatedly stressing phrases like "honestly speaking" and "sincerely." The rhetoric is often confrontational, accusing the opposing side of falsehoods and misunderstanding. They provide many specific examples drawn from their personal experience and utilize a colloquial style that makes the speech accessible.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
They use rhetorical questions and irony ("oh, surprise!") to emphasize their position. The style is direct and confrontational, especially regarding the Social Democrats. It relies on facts and figures but presents them in an emotionally charged context, utilizing clear contrasts and accusations.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Uses emotionally charged and direct rhetoric, calling the car tax a "scam" and "the culmination of all mistakes." It relies heavily on concrete examples and personal stories (a family with six children, a single parent raising a child in a wheelchair). It combines fact-based arguments with emotional appeals, also employing irony and sarcasm to criticize the government.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
Uses a confrontational and demanding tone, consistently posing direct questions and insisting on specific answers. They rely heavily on data and facts, but express clear displeasure regarding the current situation. They repeat their core questions if they remain unanswered, and employ rhetorical techniques to emphasize accountability.
2025-02-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
They employ a direct and emotional approach, blending fact-based arguments with personal experience. The rhetoric is often critical and confrontational, particularly when addressing government policy. They frequently draw examples from their home region and utilize practical arguments rather than abstract concepts.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
It employs an analytical approach focused on factual inquiries, providing specific figures and data. The rhetoric is direct and challenging, particularly when scrutinizing the Prime Minister's assertions. It balances logical arguments with emotional appeals concerning energy security. The style is relatively formal and technically detailed.
2025-01-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
The speaking style is direct and confrontational, employing rhetorical questions and highlighting contradictions. The speaker utilizes logical argumentation, relying on facts and sources, but the tone is simultaneously distinctly accusatory. The speaker uses comparisons and examples to strengthen their argument and demands direct answers.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
The speaker employs a direct, emotional, and often sarcastic tone, blending it with concrete figures and facts. They use powerful, illustrative examples (such as the losses faced by a six-child family or their personal experience with snow) to humanize abstract political issues. The style is combative yet thoroughly argued—they don't just rely on emotion but back up their assertions with numerical data and legal references.
2025-01-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The speaker employs emotional and combative rhetoric, combining personal examples (a 900-euro car tax bill for a family with six children) with fact-based arguments. Their approach is direct and critically sharp, utilizing irony ("peasant wisdom foreign to the squirrels") and rhetorical questions. The style is populist, emphasizing the concerns of ordinary people against the ruling elite.
2024-12-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The tone is frank and critical, blending expressions of support with sharp criticism. It highlights contradictions and demands consistency, using phrases such as "could have been a little more honest" and "unfortunately, the government certainly doesn't set that example." The style is argumentative and fact-based, yet emotionally charged.
2024-12-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker employs direct and emotional rhetoric, combining fact-based arguments with harsh assessments (such as "a total farce" and "a grim joke"). They draw on personal experiences and comparisons, utilize irony, and conclude their addresses with categorical statements. The style is more confrontational than conciliatory.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Uses an emotional and combative tone, labeling the government's policies a "nightmare" and a "social democratic lie." It relies heavily on specific numbers and facts, but frames them within dramatic rhetoric. Irony and sarcasm are used repeatedly, particularly aimed at the social democrats and the coalition. Speeches conclude with emotional appeals and the delivery of promises.
2024-12-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session.
It uses an emotional and confrontational tone, starting with an apology and labeling the situation as "embarrassing." The rhetoric is accusatory and utilizes contrasting comparisons ("good decisions when Isamaa is in power, bad ones without"). It concludes with a call for honesty, which emphasizes moral superiority.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
It employs an emotional and combative tone, often utilizing irony and sarcasm ("How sad!", "Embarrassing!"). It relies on both numerical analysis and emotional appeals, especially when discussing pensioners and families. Direct accusations and personal references are used regarding politicians, including the business interests of the former prime minister.
2024-12-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The speaking style is direct and demanding, utilizing concrete examples and figures. He/She poses clear questions and requires direct answers ("The question is simple: are you willing to take these topics to the council?"). The overall style is rather formal and fact-based, yet simultaneously slightly pressuring.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
An emotional and combative style, often employing rhetorical questions and direct accusations. It combines fact-based arguments with personal anecdotes and historical references. The style utilizes colloquial language ("pals," "for God's sake") and metaphors ("got off on the wrong foot," "the real issue is buried somewhere else entirely").
2024-11-20
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing.
The speaker employs a fact-based and systematic approach, presenting specific figures and dates to support their arguments. Their tone is critical, yet courteous, utilizing the formal address "Honorable Prime Minister" and "Honorable Minister." They structure their speeches logically, moving from one topic to the next with clear transitions.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
He employs emotional and confrontational rhetoric, labeling the government's actions as "a mess" and "utter nonsense." He relies heavily on specific figures and examples, combining factual analysis with personal experience (e.g., the drive from Tartu to Tallinn). He uses vivid comparisons and metaphors ("the opposition is being steamrolled"), and often concludes his speeches with a call for a more serious discussion.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
Adopting a fact-based and direct approach, the speaker relies on concrete figures and examples. The style is critical yet constructive, consistently offering alternative solutions. They employ rhetorical questions and personal experiences (specifically referencing a prior conversation with the Climate Minister) to underscore their viewpoints.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The tone is sharp and confrontational, employing emotionally charged phrases such as "stupid bills" and personal attacks. The rhetoric is populist, focusing on the struggles of ordinary people and families. Irony and sarcasm are used, particularly when referencing competitors' promises and ratings. The argumentation blends emotional appeals with concrete numerical examples.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The speaking style is direct and question-driven, employing a practical approach when clarifying complex subjects. The speaker utilizes specific examples and figures to back up their arguments, maintaining courtesy ("Thank you, esteemed Chair!"), yet simultaneously posing pointed questions. The style is fact-based rather than emotional, focusing primarily on resolving practical issues.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The speaker employs a direct and confrontational style, posing pointed questions and demanding clear answers. They utilize rhetorical devices such as "with a loud and clear voice" and conclude with the dramatic question, "Is the Minister of the Interior lying, or were you mistaken?" The style is fact-based but emotionally charged, especially when addressing security issues.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
It employs a direct and confrontational style, blending emotional assertions with fact-based arguments. The rhetoric is often accusatory (e.g., "the lying bill," "the blind and black budget"), yet it is backed up by specific figures. Rhetorical questions and irony are frequently used to criticize the government’s actions.
2024-10-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
The speaker employs a factual and persuasive approach, relying on specific figures and examples. Their tone is constructive and inquisitive, rather than aggressive—they are seeking dialogue and solutions. The rhetoric is direct and practical, focusing on economic arguments and realistic alternatives.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
They employ direct and confrontational rhetoric, combining fact-based arguments with emotional judgments. The tone is critical and accusatory, especially regarding the government's economic policy. The approach is detailed and technically thorough, utilizing specific figures and examples to support their positions.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaking style is direct and interrogative, frequently employing rhetorical questions aimed at the ministers. The tone remains critical yet courteous, always beginning with the phrase, "Thank you, esteemed/dear presiding officer/minister." It blends emotional arguments (such as the "shearing" or "clipping" of successful individuals) with logical inquiries concerning budgetary inconsistencies. Everyday analogies are used (like moving a computer from one room to another) to clarify complex bureaucratic procedures.
2024-10-08
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaking style is direct and critical, using rhetorical questions and demanding concrete answers. The speaker combines fact-based arguments with emotional appeal, using irony ("I always laugh") and highlighting contradictions in the government's actions.
2024-09-24
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
Employs the tactic of asking questions to pressure ministers and expose the shortcomings of the proposed bills. The style is polite, but consistently critical, combining fact-based arguments with emotional impact ("nobody understands," "extremely few").
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
It uses a questioning and critical tone, addressing the Chancellor of Justice directly. The style is polite but sharp, employing concrete examples and factual claims to describe the situation. It concludes with a rhetorical question that emphasizes the seriousness of the problem.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
Uses emotional and confrontational rhetoric, calling the government's decisions "stupid" and "shameful." Relies on specific numbers and examples, particularly when illustrating the inadequacy of support for people with disabilities. Uses personal experiences and comparisons to make the arguments more convincing.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
The speaker adopts a humble and formally polite tone, starting with a "modest question" and employing standard parliamentary addresses ("Mr./Madam Speaker," "Honorable Prime Ministerial Candidate"). The style is factual and direct, focusing on specific issues without emotional commentary or judgment.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The speaker employs emotionally charged and combative rhetoric, referring to the situation as a "nightmare" and using metaphors such as "mushrooms after rain." This approach combines emotional appeals with concrete facts and figures, directly addressing colleagues' consciences ("if they put their hand on their heart"). The style is straightforward and confrontational.
2024-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, extra plenary sitting
The speaker employs emotional and combative rhetoric, labeling the draft bill "criminal" and accusing opponents of "lying." The style is personal and passionate, utilizing direct addresses ("I can boldly look you in the eye") and specific examples of domestic responsibilities (mowing the lawn, shoveling snow). The speaker combines emotional appeals with factual arguments, thereby creating a powerful rhetorical impact.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
An emotional and confrontational style, utilizing sharp expressions such as "criminal law" and "lied five times." It combines factual arguments with dramatic imagery (people "will be killed off," "a mourning flag on Midsummer's Day"). The important message is repeated multiple times for emphasis, and rhetorical questions are used to increase impact.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker employs emotional and combative rhetoric, combining it with concrete data. He uses figurative language ("taxes springing up like mushrooms after the rain") and personal attacks ("you really stepped in it"). The style is direct and populist, concluding with a clear electoral appeal to vote for Isamaa.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker employs highly emotional and confrontational rhetoric, repeatedly accusing the minister and officials of lying. They appeal strongly to facts and documents, demanding a precise reading of the draft legislation. While using personal experiences and concrete examples to support their position, they maintain an aggressive and accusatory tone.
2024-05-28
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
He/She employs emotional and accusatory rhetoric, combining it with specific numerical data. The tone of the speech is sharp and critical, utilizing personal examples (the French Lyceum, mothers and fathers) and rhetorical questions. It concludes with a dramatic declaration that he/she is ashamed to be a member of the Riigikogu.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker adopts a direct and confrontational tone, immediately beginning by dismantling opposing arguments. They sharply criticize the "young parliamentary colleagues" for their ignorance and employ emotional language such as "nonsense" and "brawling." The style is fact-based, yet simultaneously passionate and includes personal accusations.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
They use a sharp, accusatory tone, relying on specific facts and quotes from other politicians. The rhetoric is combative and direct, employing questions to pressure the opponent. The argumentation is logical, based on comparisons and concrete examples (scooters vs. platform services).
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker adopts a polite and constructive approach, beginning with expressions of gratitude and commending the topic. The rhetoric is inquisitive and analytical, focusing on finding practical solutions through concrete examples.
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
The speaker employs emotional and confrontational rhetoric, combining it with fact-based arguments. The style is direct and accusatory ("the government is going to break its promise," "moral"), utilizing rhetorical questions and personal addresses directed at the minister. The tone is passionate and critical, highlighting the government's contradictions.
2024-04-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
He/She employs a fact-based and pragmatic approach, relying on specific figures and historical examples. The rhetoric is straightforward and critical, particularly when addressing previous political decisions. He/She balances technical explanations with practical examples, such as the effect of cold winter days on energy demand.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaking style is hesitant and inquisitive, characterized by frequent rhetorical questions ("Is this really equal treatment?"). The speaker relies on concrete examples and personal memories, including anecdotes drawn from the Jõgeva pub and a local care home. The tone is moderately critical yet constructive, aiming to find solutions to the issues raised.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing
The approach used is direct and question-centric, starting with specific figures and facts. The rhetoric is critical yet courteous, utilizing formal address such as "good minister." Real-life examples are introduced (e.g., questions asked on the street, visiting the embassy), and persistent questions are posed to elicit answers. The overall style is practical and fact-driven.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
It employs the tactic of asking questions and specific examples (Vana Baskini Teater, Improteater) to bolster its argument. The rhetoric is direct and fact-based, highlighting the contradiction between low ticket prices and significant state funding in the case of certain theaters.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
They employ a diplomatic yet determined approach, starting with positive remarks before posing critical questions. They rely on facts and concrete examples, utilizing rhetorical questions and personal experiences to illustrate their arguments. Politeness is maintained, but clear disappointment is expressed regarding the insufficient oversight.
2024-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
They use direct and emotional rhetoric, combining fact-based arguments with personal experience. The tone is often critical and ironic, exemplified by phrases like ("we're going nowhere," "we're just talking hot air"). They pose numerous rhetorical questions and demand concrete answers, frequently employing phrases such as "I haven't heard anything today" to underscore the lack of response.
2024-04-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The speaker employs emotional and confrontational rhetoric, accusing the government of "lying" and utilizing the "steamroller method." While relying heavily on numerical arguments and concrete examples, these points are presented in the form of sharp criticism. Colloquial expressions such as "car tax" and "steamroller" are used to make the message more accessible.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
He/She employs emotional rhetoric, sometimes tinged with irony, introducing historical comparisons (Kalevipoeg, Stone Age people) and examples from everyday life. The speaker stresses a practical approach, urging colleagues to "get out of Tallinn" and see the reality of rural life. He/She uses direct questions and specific examples to illustrate their positions, demonstrating a populist rather than a technocratic approach.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.
He/She employs a direct and confrontational approach, especially when dealing with government representatives. The style is fact-based, relying on concrete examples and numerical data. The rhetoric is pragmatic, focusing on solving practical problems, and also includes personal references ("I can explain this to you separately for fifteen minutes").
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
He employs a direct and emotional approach, combining personal experiences ("I have also been a much heavier guy") with fact-based arguments. His rhetoric is often confrontational toward the current government, yet constructive when it comes to offering solutions. He uses a colloquial style and practical examples to make his message more accessible.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
It employs a direct and critical tone, especially concerning Elering and government policy. The rhetoric is fact-based, relying on specific figures and examples, but it also includes emotional phrases like "what kind of nonsense is this?" and "they are taking money right out of our pockets." It uses comparisons with the experiences of other countries to reinforce its arguments.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
Employs fact-rich and data-driven argumentation, combining it with emotional appeals ("from our pocket," "makes your life harder"). The rhetoric is direct and critical, but stays within the bounds of civility. Comparisons to other projects (Balticconnector, Paldiski LNG) are repeatedly used to highlight the absurdity of the situation. It concludes with concrete proposals and requests directed to the Prime Minister.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker employs direct, confrontational, and emotional rhetoric. They often open with phrases like "let's be honest" and "believe it or not," utilizing rhetorical questions and irony. They rely on both factual evidence and emotional appeals, sharply criticizing the opposition and demanding accountability.
2024-02-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaking style is sharp and confrontational, utilizing emotionally charged phrases like "stupid decisions," "crazy idea," and "crap." It combines an aggressive tone with the presentation of specific facts and figures. It uses rhetorical questions ("What are we even talking about?") and personal attacks against politicians who have "never worked in economics."
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
They employ a direct and emotional approach, blending personal anecdotes (spouse, mother, grandchildren) with political arguments. Specific figures and facts are frequently cited to back up their views. The rhetoric is highly critical of the government, utilizing sharp expressions such as "stupid decisions" and "2 billion euros vanished just like that." They stress the importance of practical entrepreneurial experience when making political decisions.
2024-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
It employs a direct and practical approach, combining personal experience (their own forest) with concrete data. The tone is constructive, yet critical of the current system. It repeatedly stresses practical solutions and uses clear examples to back up its arguments. The style is technical and fact-based rather than emotional, although it clearly expresses concern regarding the current situation.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The speaker employs an extremely confrontational and blunt style. They use strong language, such as phrases like "to refute a lie" and "I wouldn't let the prime minister lie," which demonstrates an emotional and aggressive approach to political debate.
2024-01-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The speaker employs a direct and emotional style of speaking, labeling certain decisions as "madness" and "stupid." They rely on both facts and personal experience, providing vivid, real-life examples. The tone is critical and concerned, especially regarding the economy and energy security. The speaker uses rhetorical questions and direct addresses aimed at the ministers.