By Plenary Sessions: Aivar Kokk

Uses emotional and confrontational rhetoric, calling the government's decisions "stupid" and "shameful." Relies on specific numbers and examples, particularly when illustrating the inadequacy of support for people with disabilities. Uses personal experiences and comparisons to make the arguments more convincing.

The speaker adopts a humble and formally polite tone, starting with a "modest question" and employing standard parliamentary addresses ("Mr./Madam Speaker," "Honorable Prime Ministerial Candidate"). The style is factual and direct, focusing on specific issues without emotional commentary or judgment.

The speaker employs emotionally charged and combative rhetoric, referring to the situation as a "nightmare" and using metaphors such as "mushrooms after rain." This approach combines emotional appeals with concrete facts and figures, directly addressing colleagues' consciences ("if they put their hand on their heart"). The style is straightforward and confrontational.