By Plenary Sessions: Aivar Kokk

They employ a direct and emotional approach, blending personal anecdotes (spouse, mother, grandchildren) with political arguments. Specific figures and facts are frequently cited to back up their views. The rhetoric is highly critical of the government, utilizing sharp expressions such as "stupid decisions" and "2 billion euros vanished just like that." They stress the importance of practical entrepreneurial experience when making political decisions.

It employs a direct and practical approach, combining personal experience (their own forest) with concrete data. The tone is constructive, yet critical of the current system. It repeatedly stresses practical solutions and uses clear examples to back up its arguments. The style is technical and fact-based rather than emotional, although it clearly expresses concern regarding the current situation.

The speaker employs an extremely confrontational and blunt style. They use strong language, such as phrases like "to refute a lie" and "I wouldn't let the prime minister lie," which demonstrates an emotional and aggressive approach to political debate.

The speaker employs a direct and emotional style of speaking, labeling certain decisions as "madness" and "stupid." They rely on both facts and personal experience, providing vivid, real-life examples. The tone is critical and concerned, especially regarding the economy and energy security. The speaker uses rhetorical questions and direct addresses aimed at the ministers.