By Months: Mait Klaassen
Total Months: 9
Fully Profiled: 9
12.2024
25 Speeches
The main opponents are the Isamaa faction (with proposals opposing the abolition of the car tax and the state fee) and the opposition parties (who are branding the Earth Crust Act as unconstitutional). The criticism is policy- and procedure-based. The speaker rejects Isamaa's proposals because they conflict with the government's action plan and the state budget, and deems the opposition's tone regarding unconstitutionality to be exaggerated.
11.2024
3 Speeches
The criticism is directed at the prevailing management model, which only deals with addressing consequences, and at those who oppose the use of biomass as fast-cycle carbon ("the forest war"). This resistance is based on policy and models, emphasizing the inefficiency of outdated solutions.
09.2024
5 Speeches
There is no direct criticism of political opponents, but the speaker does criticize the government's actions concerning the complexity of bureaucracy (specifically citing the documentation required for African swine fever). Concern is also voiced regarding the PPA's (Police and Border Guard Board) practice of conducting unannounced home visits to inspect firearms, viewing this as a threat to the sanctity of the home. Furthermore, criticism is directed at the potential negative socio-economic impact of the 800-euro state fee imposed for the deregistration of scrap vehicles.
06.2024
2 Speeches
There is no opposition. The politician does not criticize any political opponent or group. The only reference made is to people who are not obeying the law, but this is more a description of the situation than a political attack.
05.2024
3 Speeches
The primary criticism is aimed at the actions of the Government of the Republic of Estonia, questioning the validity of their decisions and the direction taken in budget consolidation. Criticism is also directed at legislative amendments which could infringe upon citizens' fundamental rights and grant excessive control to banks.
04.2024
5 Speeches
The criticism is aimed at the state's funding policy, which replaces paid education with state budget money, calling it a financially inefficient "hat trick." No direct political opponent is named, but the inadequacy of the solutions and the inability to secure substantial additional funding are criticized.
03.2024
4 Speeches
The opposition is aimed at the decision-making processes of the government or the proposers, which are deemed insufficiently justified and short-sighted. The criticism is procedural and policy-based, focusing on deficiencies in terms of research and long-term planning. Specifically criticized is the making of "empirical decisions" without the necessary foundational research.
02.2024
2 Speeches
The speaker opposes those who wish to restrict the rights of electoral alliances and centralize power in the hands of political parties. The criticism is both procedural and political, warning against the emergence of political maneuvering in local governments and calling into question the opposing side's optimistic assumptions. He/She also criticizes the discussion for being "diffuse," pointing to the lack of clarity in the debate.
01.2024
2 Speeches
Strong opposition has been directed at the claims presented to the environmental commission, especially regarding the deposition of nanoparticles from aircraft. The criticism is both scientific and fundamental, accusing the presenter of disregarding the laws of atmospheric physics and submitting inaccurate data.