By Plenary Sessions: Mait Klaassen

The primary adversaries are the opposition parties, who face criticism for their repeated assertions regarding the unconstitutionality of the legislation. The speaker acknowledges that this falls within the opposition's mandate, but scrutinizes the accuracy and necessity of these claims.

There is no direct personal confrontation, but legal objections raised by the Riigikogu Legal and Analysis Department regarding the infringement of legitimate expectation and the fundamental right to property are being addressed. These objections are mitigated by the Ministry of Climate's stance that the infringements resulting from the suspension outweigh the potential damages arising from unrealized rights. Businesses (e.g., VKG) declined to submit their positions if the deadline for the restrictions remains permanent.

The primary conflict is with the Isamaa faction, whose amendments seeking to repeal the motor vehicle tax were rejected, citing the government’s action plan and budget. Proposals put forth by Riigikogu member Raimond Kaljulaid to restrict light personal mobility devices were also rejected on procedural grounds, as they were not directly related to the bill being discussed and required further analysis.