By Plenary Sessions: Mait Klaassen

The rhetorical style is formal, analytical, and persuasive, relying primarily on logical reasoning and legal arguments. The tone is responsible and authoritative, emphasizing the law's objective to prevent significant economic harm and protect the state's interests as the owner of mineral resources.

The rhetorical style is formal, detailed, and procedural, typical of the rapporteur for the leading committee, who focuses on the neutral presentation of the draft legislation's history and the committee's decisions. The argumentation is predominantly logical and fact-based, emphasizing legal clarity and the avoidance of costs for businesses. The tone is moderate but stresses the necessity of suspension to avoid having to say "no" to businesses at a later stage.

The rhetorical style is highly formal, procedural, and informative, focusing on the detailed presentation of the preparations for the second reading of the draft bill. When answering questions, the tone is defensively justificatory, particularly regarding the car tax and the environmental levy, utilizing logical arguments and references to the objectives of the draft legislation.