By Months: Mait Klaassen

Total Months: 15

Fully Profiled: 15

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
10.2025

3 Speeches

Direct adversaries or groups subject to criticism are absent from the speeches; the focus is on resolving technical and regulatory issues. He is rather engaged in risk mitigation, for example, by inquiring about the protection of trade secrets and national security when chemical data is disclosed.
Details View Details
09.2025

8 Speeches

The criticism is primarily directed at the procedures implemented by the government and various agencies, which are either unfair or insufficient. The practice of imposing nature conservation restrictions without involving the owner is particularly criticized; in his estimation, this is divisive to society. The insufficient volume of regional investments is also criticized.
Details View Details
06.2025

4 Speeches

The criticism is directed at those preparing the policy or draft legislation, demanding better justification (wind farm restrictions) and deep introspection concerning the shortcomings of the education system. The criticism is policy- and results-based, specifically asking who is obstructing the advancement of the curriculum.
Details View Details
03.2025

3 Speeches

The speaker is highly critical of the new government regarding cuts to higher education funding, demanding clarification regarding the violation of previous agreements. He/She also criticizes the proponent of the border bill, calling into question the significance of the figures presented and the bill's actual impact on freight transport. The criticism is based on both policy and procedure.
Details View Details
02.2025

2 Speeches

No direct confrontation is voiced, but the politician questions the sufficiency and clarity of existing procedures (maritime security) and regulations (nuisance animals/pest control). The criticism is directed at gaps in policy implementation, rather than individuals.
Details View Details
01.2025

1 Speeches

Insufficient data.
Details View Details
12.2024

25 Speeches

The main opponents are the Isamaa faction (with proposals opposing the abolition of the car tax and the state fee) and the opposition parties (who are branding the Earth Crust Act as unconstitutional). The criticism is policy- and procedure-based. The speaker rejects Isamaa's proposals because they conflict with the government's action plan and the state budget, and deems the opposition's tone regarding unconstitutionality to be exaggerated.
Details View Details
11.2024

3 Speeches

The criticism is directed at the prevailing management model, which only deals with addressing consequences, and at those who oppose the use of biomass as fast-cycle carbon ("the forest war"). This resistance is based on policy and models, emphasizing the inefficiency of outdated solutions.
Details View Details
09.2024

5 Speeches

There is no direct criticism of political opponents, but the speaker does criticize the government's actions concerning the complexity of bureaucracy (specifically citing the documentation required for African swine fever). Concern is also voiced regarding the PPA's (Police and Border Guard Board) practice of conducting unannounced home visits to inspect firearms, viewing this as a threat to the sanctity of the home. Furthermore, criticism is directed at the potential negative socio-economic impact of the 800-euro state fee imposed for the deregistration of scrap vehicles.
Details View Details
06.2024

2 Speeches

There is no opposition. The politician does not criticize any political opponent or group. The only reference made is to people who are not obeying the law, but this is more a description of the situation than a political attack.
Details View Details
05.2024

3 Speeches

The primary criticism is aimed at the actions of the Government of the Republic of Estonia, questioning the validity of their decisions and the direction taken in budget consolidation. Criticism is also directed at legislative amendments which could infringe upon citizens' fundamental rights and grant excessive control to banks.
Details View Details
04.2024

5 Speeches

The criticism is aimed at the state's funding policy, which replaces paid education with state budget money, calling it a financially inefficient "hat trick." No direct political opponent is named, but the inadequacy of the solutions and the inability to secure substantial additional funding are criticized.
Details View Details
03.2024

4 Speeches

The opposition is aimed at the decision-making processes of the government or the proposers, which are deemed insufficiently justified and short-sighted. The criticism is procedural and policy-based, focusing on deficiencies in terms of research and long-term planning. Specifically criticized is the making of "empirical decisions" without the necessary foundational research.
Details View Details
02.2024

2 Speeches

The speaker opposes those who wish to restrict the rights of electoral alliances and centralize power in the hands of political parties. The criticism is both procedural and political, warning against the emergence of political maneuvering in local governments and calling into question the opposing side's optimistic assumptions. He/She also criticizes the discussion for being "diffuse," pointing to the lack of clarity in the debate.
Details View Details
01.2024

2 Speeches

Strong opposition has been directed at the claims presented to the environmental commission, especially regarding the deposition of nanoparticles from aircraft. The criticism is both scientific and fundamental, accusing the presenter of disregarding the laws of atmospheric physics and submitting inaccurate data.
Details View Details
Back to Profiling