By Plenary Sessions: Mait Klaassen

The criticism is directed at systemic inefficiency and an unspecified individual or group who is "hindering the advancement of the integrated curriculum." The opposition is policy-based, focusing on poor results and demanding the removal of obstacles.

The opposition is directed at the justification of regulatory decisions (e.g., the 20 km limit in maritime areas) and the process of preparing the draft legislation. The speaker asks whether institutions and schools were consulted regarding the timing change, pointing to a possible deficiency in the preparation of the draft. The criticism is procedural and policy-based.