By Months: Liina Kersna

The discourse is formal, detailed, and procedural, especially when introducing the second reading, where a comprehensive overview of the committee's work and stakeholder engagement is presented. The tone is measured and analytical, focusing on logical arguments, the technical progression of the draft law, and the established timelines.

The rhetorical style is highly formal, informative, and procedural, making it suitable for the role of a steering committee's presentation in the Riigikogu. The address is logical and fact-based, focusing on the substance of the draft bill, a detailed summary of the committee discussions, and the communication of decisions reached by consensus. Emotional appeals are absent; the emphasis is placed on legislative precision and procedural transparency.

The rhetorical style is formal, respectful, and analytical, respectfully addressing the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and thanking him for the comprehensive presentation. The speaker poses logical and systematic questions, relying on specific data (the exam pass percentage), while avoiding emotional appeals. The tone is investigative and solution-oriented.

The style is formal, respectful, and analytical, directed towards ministers and bank officials. The speaker poses numerous questions requiring specific data (e.g., the number of families, areas of investment). Criticism directed at the government is policy-based and focuses on economic rationality, prioritizing necessary decisions over painful ones.

The style is formal and procedural, addressing the esteemed Speaker of the Riigikogu and colleagues. The tone is explanatory and analytical, emphasizing the necessity of the law and the history of the proceedings, but it also contains veiled frustration regarding previous obstruction. The appeals are primarily logical, focusing on facts and the progress of the procedure.

The rhetorical style is analytical, formal, and cautious, emphasizing the thoroughness of processes and the importance of consultation. It employs logical arguments and references change management models, while simultaneously warning against "breaking" the sector through overly rapid reforms. It utilizes a metaphor that underscores the value of education, describing the euros directed toward education as an investment in a smarter society.

The tone is polite and formal, utilizing forms of address such as "Honorable Presenter" and "Honorable Prime Minister." The style is analytical and question-oriented, focusing on logical arguments and the operation of political mechanisms (the distribution of funds). The objective is to highlight the system's deficiencies and obtain clarifications.