By Plenary Sessions: Liina Kersna

The tone is predominantly factual, analytical, and procedural, especially concerning reports from the Culture Committee. It employs logical appeals and emphasizes an evidence-based approach, but also expresses a personal fear regarding overly rapid and ill-considered educational reforms. The language is formal and detailed, focusing primarily on communicating processes and timelines.

The style is formal, analytical, and advisory, combining support for the Minister with careful criticism regarding the pace of reform implementation. Logical and procedural arguments are employed, emphasizing the importance of listening and justification. The discourse is occasionally elevated, highlighting the fundamental role of education in fostering social cohesion and generating wealth.