By Plenary Sessions: Mario Kadastik

The speaker emphasizes the necessity of holding an objective and high-quality debate and verifying facts, referencing a consultation with ornithology researcher Marko Mägi. He identifies himself as a member of the Reform Party who is prepared to engage in debates, but only when objective data is used. Openness to compromise with the current opposing side is not expressed; instead, the correction of facts is demanded.

It demonstrated close cooperation with the leading committee and the Ministry of Climate, taking into account the Ministry's proposals and the views of the legal department. It widely involved stakeholders and market participants (ten feedback providers) and was ready to withdraw or adjust its own amendments in accordance with the positions of the Ministry and the TTJA. The Committee did not support the proposal of the Isamaa faction, as it was not optimal from the consumer's point of view.

The committee proceedings detailed the voting results (e.g., 6 in favor, 3 against), highlighting the disagreements between the coalition and the opposition. The speaker is open to cooperation and dialogue, offering the opposing side the chance to discuss the matter even outside official sessions, and stresses the necessity of collaboration between developers and local communities.

There is insufficient data regarding the collaboration style.

The collaborative approach is based on consensus, as the Economic Affairs Committee made its decisions consensually during the processing of the draft bill. Furthermore, the speaker referred to the contributions of representatives from the Ministry of Climate and the Ministry of Social Affairs, as well as scientific literature, demonstrating cooperation with both ministries and experts.