By Plenary Sessions: Mario Kadastik
Total Sessions: 51
Fully Profiled: 51
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker is collaborative, conveying questions and clarifications from colleagues (Aab, Sutt, Maastik) and highlighting decisions reached by consensus (the appointment of the lead committee representative). He/She also refers to negotiations between the Ministry of Climate, the EU Commission, and market participants aimed at finding improved wording.
2025-10-14
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Highly cooperative, repeatedly emphasizing that the committee's decisions were made by consensus. Demonstrates a willingness to compromise, working with the minister to find a technical solution (using a register photo) and promising to submit it as an amendment for the second reading.
2025-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Insufficient Data
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The cooperation style is consensual and open, as the speaker was appointed by consensus as the representative of the steering committee, and the decisions regarding the further processing of the draft bill were also consensual. Cooperation is carried out with ministries (the Ministry of Justice and the Ministry of Digital Affairs) and representatives of other factions (Lauri Laats, Marek Reinaas) within the framework of the committee.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The speaker demonstrated a willingness to cooperate at the committee level, as they were appointed by consensus as the representative of the lead committee. A structured discussion took place within the committee, resulting in a clear proposal to reject the draft legislation (7 votes in favor, 3 against).
2025-09-23
15th Riigikogu, 6th session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is direct and geared toward information gathering, involving active participation in the question-and-answer session to gain clarity on the regulation and understand its limits.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
The speaker is working in collaboration with the commission and the ministries, referencing the consensual appointment of the rapporteur and discussions held with the Ministry of Finance and the LKF (Estonian Motor Insurers' Bureau). They emphasize the need to continue the discussion with the relevant ministry in order to find a broader and more comprehensive regulation. They also acknowledge the contributions of other colleagues (e.g., Urve Tiidus) to these discussions.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Not enough data
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The cooperative approach is solution-oriented and pragmatic, showing a willingness to overcome procedural hurdles, such as proposing the inclusion of Toomas Kivimäe in the leadership. The nuclear energy decision was initiated with broad support from members of the Riigikogu, pointing to cross-factional cooperation (55 signatures).
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker stresses the Reform Party's strong support for the bill, indicating internal party unity. There is no information available regarding their openness to compromises or cross-party cooperation.
2025-06-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker demonstrates a pragmatic willingness to cooperate, emphasizing that any shortcomings in the law can be rectified later if the implementation phase reveals a need for specific mechanisms or improved processes. Reference is also made to Minister Pakosta's assurance that all significant concerns have been addressed in the draft bill.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Not enough data
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The collaboration style is respectful and inquisitive, focused on obtaining clarification from the government representative (the minister) regarding technical solutions and risk mitigation. While there are no references to cross-party cooperation, a clear desire is evident to receive confirmation from the government regarding the correctness of the legislation.
2025-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
The speaker is collaborative, emphasizing a common understanding regarding certain issues (e.g., the need for skilled labor in engineering faculties). Input will be taken on board (e.g., regarding additional assessment measures for automation and the example of Swedish milling) for further work in developing ENMAK and other strategies.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
There is not enough data.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The style of cooperation is evident in the attempt to motivate the opposing side (Raini) to vote for the bill, by pointing out that the bill also supports the construction of his preferred dispatchable capacities (e.g., gas plants). This demonstrates a readiness to leverage shared political objectives to gain support. Direct compromise or cross-party cooperation is not described; rather, it is a matter of persuasion.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker works closely with the Ministry of Climate, supporting the amendments proposed by the commission that were based on the ministry’s feedback. He/She emphasizes extensive engagement with market participants and stakeholders and is prepared to modify his/her original proposals if the ministry's solution (e.g., eliminating the restriction on the length of the direct line) is more rational. He/She also refers to the cross-party debate (with Kilk and Hääl) regarding the frequency market.
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker emphasizes the necessity of holding an objective and high-quality debate and verifying facts, referencing a consultation with ornithology researcher Marko Mägi. He identifies himself as a member of the Reform Party who is prepared to engage in debates, but only when objective data is used. Openness to compromise with the current opposing side is not expressed; instead, the correction of facts is demanded.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
It demonstrated close cooperation with the leading committee and the Ministry of Climate, taking into account the Ministry's proposals and the views of the legal department. It widely involved stakeholders and market participants (ten feedback providers) and was ready to withdraw or adjust its own amendments in accordance with the positions of the Ministry and the TTJA. The Committee did not support the proposal of the Isamaa faction, as it was not optimal from the consumer's point of view.
2025-04-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The committee proceedings detailed the voting results (e.g., 6 in favor, 3 against), highlighting the disagreements between the coalition and the opposition. The speaker is open to cooperation and dialogue, offering the opposing side the chance to discuss the matter even outside official sessions, and stresses the necessity of collaboration between developers and local communities.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
There is insufficient data regarding the collaboration style.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The collaborative approach is based on consensus, as the Economic Affairs Committee made its decisions consensually during the processing of the draft bill. Furthermore, the speaker referred to the contributions of representatives from the Ministry of Climate and the Ministry of Social Affairs, as well as scientific literature, demonstrating cooperation with both ministries and experts.
2025-03-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
It reports on the commission's consensus procedural decisions but acknowledges a clear disagreement in the substantive vote (a motion for rejection passed with 7 votes in favor and 2 against). It refers to the Republic's Government's unanimous decision not to support the draft bill. It mentions the Social Democrats as the party that had previously strongly pushed the topic of offshore wind energy.
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is inquisitive and demands concrete plans and solutions from the government (the Prime Minister) for maintaining the foundational basis of fundamental sciences. This indicates a readiness for dialogue, but from a position of critical oversight.
2025-01-29
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is consultative and consensus-based, emphasizing the Economic Affairs Committee's unanimous decision to support the Chancellor of Justice's proposal. Active consultation is underway with the Office of the Chancellor of Justice, the Ministry of Climate, and the European Commission to find a legal solution.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
The collaborative style is consensual and open. The speaker emphasizes that all procedural decisions within the committee (such as placing drafts on the agenda and concluding their reading) were made by consensus. He actively participates in the question-and-answer session to clarify political details and discussion points raised by his colleagues.
2024-12-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
Not enough data.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation in the committee work is consensual, emphasizing that all procedural decisions and proposed amendments received consensual support in the Economic Affairs Committee. Cooperation took place with representatives of the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Justice, whose proposals were entered into the draft bill's record.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is consensus-based and open, given that all final decisions of the commission were consensual. A willingness is demonstrated to seek advice from the Legal and Analysis Department of the Chancellery of the Riigikogu to ensure the legal correctness of the proceedings. Cooperation also involves the participation of the minister in the introduction of the draft legislation.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
It describes the cooperation with the Ministry of Climate and various stakeholders (e.g., Utilitas Wind, Enefit Green, the Private Forest Association), whose opinions were taken into account. Within the commission, openness to discussions is demonstrated (for instance, regarding the definition of a recording), but decisions are reached through clear voting results (e.g., 6 votes in favor and 3 votes against), which indicates the majority holds a firm position.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The speaker emphasizes cooperation, highlighting that Arvo Aller made the compromise proposal to include the ownership issue, and that this was also supported by other EKRE members (Anti Poolamets). This demonstrates a willingness to incorporate proposals from opposing parties into the legislative process.
2024-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The speaker collaborates with the government and international organizations, referencing the minister's speech and the March decision of the CERN Council. The approach is aimed at the consensual adoption of the law to ensure Estonia's representation in the international decision-making process.
2024-06-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The collaborative approach is open, involving interest groups and ministry representatives whose views were reviewed and who were invited to participate in the committee discussions. It is emphasized that the steering committee's procedural decisions were reached by consensus. Although a complete agreement was not achieved with the Centre Party, a willingness was demonstrated to substantively address the issues they raised.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is open and inclusive, emphasizing the work with the Ministry of Climate and the activities of the Economic Affairs Committee working group. It is noted that the proposal put forward by the member of the Riigikogu was substantively considered, and all parties were heard, which points to a readiness for compromise within the scope of the proceedings.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
Not enough data
2024-05-30
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is polite and respectful, starting with thanking the presenter for their thorough work. The aim is constructive information exchange and clarifying details regarding the state budget.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker emphasizes the importance of a broad public debate and a mandate from the Riigikogu to move forward on the issue of nuclear energy, noting that the majority of the public supports it. He expresses readiness to discuss future details (such as the form of ownership, subsidies, and the waste management fund), pointing out that these decisions will be made during the phase of drafting the legislation, not as part of the current decision in principle.
2024-05-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session
The style of cooperation is consultative and supportive, thanking the presenters for their substantive discussion and positive presentation. International cooperation with major research centers (CERN, ESA) is strongly emphasized as a strategic national priority that will help Estonia achieve its economic objectives.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The cooperation style is open to the involvement of interest groups (e.g., Utilitas Wind, Sunly) and the Ministry of Climate, and seeks consensus on procedural matters. Although the obstruction was rejected, the committee accepted several amendments by consensus, including one proposal from an opposition member (Varro Vooglaid). The committee made consensus decisions to conclude the bill's proceedings.
2024-05-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker is cooperative with coalition partners, supporting and supplementing the positions of colleague Sutt regarding e-voting. He/She emphasizes that, in order to balance the debate and clarify the procedures, representatives from RIA (the Information System Authority) or the National Electoral Committee should have been present, referencing the desire to involve technical experts.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
The collaborative approach is consensual and inclusive. The speaker emphasizes that procedural decisions (such as appointing a representative or adding items to the agenda) were made by consensus within the committee. He also refers to extensive cooperation with stakeholders when gathering opinions (via engagement letters).
2024-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is partisan, as the speech concludes with a call to support the bill on behalf of the Reform Party. At the same time, all members of the Riigikogu and political parties are urged to participate in test elections and training sessions to ensure the system's transparency and clarity.
2024-04-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker is acting on behalf of the nuclear energy support group, which indicates collaboration with this cross-factional group. He/She emphasizes that the current draft bill would grant the government a mandate to continue research and establish a framework, suggesting a desire to involve various stakeholders in a structured decision-making process.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker endorses the auditing topic raised by the colleague (Martin), indicating a willingness to concur on technical matters. Emphasis is placed on the role of state institutions (RIA, VVK) in knowledge dissemination and system validation.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker emphasizes consensus-based decisions, particularly regarding procedural issues (e.g., 363 SE). While the majority of decisions are passed by a simple majority vote, they demonstrate an openness to cooperation, such as planning a joint session concerning draft bill 384 SE with the Legal and Constitutional Committee for the purpose of broader engagement.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The style of cooperation is pragmatic and aimed at advancing the legislative process, thereby supporting the adoption of the law. The speaker refers to an inquiry from the Economic Affairs Committee, which demonstrates participation in the committee’s work, but simultaneously stresses the need for technical accuracy.
2024-03-07
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third sitting, plenary session
The style of cooperation is open and constructive, emphasizing the need to hold substantive debates with various stakeholders and keep all technological options open. It notes that the long-term plan is also important for other political parties, pointing to the desire for a broad discussion that would cover issues of security and market viability.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The cooperation style is consensual and procedural, emphasizing intra-committee consensus regarding several decisions (e.g., appointing the representative of the lead committee, or adopting the agenda). The speaker proposes involving the Riigikogu Environmental Committee for an opinion, which demonstrates openness to specialized consultations.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Demonstrates cooperativeness and procedural correctness, noting that the committee's decisions during the processing of the draft bill were consensual. They delegate technical questions to the minister or the drafters of the bill, acknowledging their limitations as the committee rapporteur.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The style of collaboration is consensual and constructive, emphasizing that all procedural decisions of the commission (including the appointment of the rapporteur and the closing of the reading) were made by consensus. Furthermore, a readiness to cooperate with interest groups is demonstrated by inquiring with the minister regarding Energiasalve's appeal and the format for cooperation.
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The collaborative style is dialogic and constructive, addressing the Prime Minister with a question and thanking him for the preceding speech. The speaker is seeking ideas and solutions from the head of government to resolve a structural problem.