By Plenary Sessions: Mario Kadastik

The political position is strongly evidence-based, focusing on energy security and objective data analysis. The most crucial topics are energy security (featuring strong opposition to lamenting the BRELL system and Russian nuclear technology) and supporting the development of renewable energy by refuting inaccurate data and exaggerated claims regarding environmental impact. The policy is heavily oriented toward market mechanisms and scientific accuracy, criticizing the unrealistically cheap rhetoric surrounding oil shale electricity. This constitutes a strongly policy- and fact-based approach.

The speaker strongly supports the energy security measures outlined in Bill 555, emphasizing the necessity of frequency reserve and island operation capability following the disconnection from the Russian grid. The position is heavily policy-driven, focusing on system stability, optimizing consumer costs, and temporarily sustaining the oil shale energy sector during the transition period. He defends the methodology chosen by the government and the system operator as the most advantageous solution for the consumer.

The political focus is heavily directed toward energy policy, supporting the ambitious 100% renewable energy goal, while simultaneously emphasizing that nuclear power is the best form of energy. Onshore wind farms are considered the most realistic short-term solution for lowering electricity prices. There is strong opposition to proposals that would result in lowering the target level, as this would be a step backward and would hinder the development of production capacity.

The political stance focuses on regulatory compliance and adherence to the law within the taxi services market. The speaker opposes the spread of misinformation, stressing that even when services are provided through an information society service, the requirements for a passenger transport license and a vehicle card remain in effect. This position is heavily rooted in policy and regulation.

The political position is against the bill halting the planning of wind farms, as it is based on ignorance and fear of unfounded infrasound dangers. This stance is strongly rooted in both policy and science, emphasizing the necessity of energy production and the current overall shortage. The speaker strongly recommends voting against the bill during the final ballot.