By Plenary Sessions: Mario Kadastik

The speaker's style is highly analytical, at times confrontational and demanding, focusing on correcting opponents' factual errors ("almost all the numbers are wrong"). He/She employs strong logical and scientific arguments to refute the opponents' emotional or fear-mongering claims (e.g., dismissing the effect of infrasound as "absurd" and a "nocebo effect"). The overall tone is critical and calls for raising the quality of this nationally important debate, accusing the opponents of "muddying the waters."

The style used when presenting the report is formal and procedural, but it turns sharp and combative when responding to the opposition. The speaker relies on logical, data-driven arguments, accusing opponents of "populism" and "intentional falsehoods," and aggressively refuting their financial forecasts (e.g., 120 million). He employs rhetoric that highlights the opposition's mathematical incompetence and political opportunism.

The style of communication is predominantly logical, explanatory, and data-driven, focusing on refuting counter-arguments using specific facts and market regulations. The tone is formal, but occasionally offers personal clarification, especially regarding recurring topics (such as the functioning of the electricity market), even extending an offer for informal discussion to the opposing party.

The rhetorical style is corrective and authoritative, aiming to draw attention to misinformation and refute it. The appeal is primarily logical and statutory, focusing on facts and regulations. The address concludes with a direct recommendation to consult the law itself, rather than relying on untrustworthy sources.

The rhetorical style is highly logical, analytical, and data-driven, focusing on debunking myths using physics and scientific literature. The tone is expert and formal, employing complex technical terminology and contrasting scientific rigor with emotional scaremongering ("attempts are made to stir people up based on ignorance"). Simple analogies are used (e.g., climbing stairs, an open car window) to explain scientific phenomena.