By Plenary Sessions: Martin Helme

The primary targets are the Reform Party, the ruling coalition, and specifically Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and Kristen Michal, who stand accused of directly steering the country toward bankruptcy. The criticism is twofold—both political (focusing on the regressive tax system and rising debt) and ethical, stemming from scandals (specifically the misappropriation of national defense funds). The intensity of the attacks is at its maximum, labeling the government's actions as incompetent and completely detached from reality.

The primary adversary is the Reform Party and its leading politicians (Kaja Kallas, Michal, Ligi), who stand accused of bankrupting the state and incompetence. The criticism is intense, encompassing both political failures (economy, national defense, tax policy) and personal attacks (the insult directed at Ligi's women/female relatives). There is zero willingness to compromise; the government's performance is viewed as a total failure.

The main opponents are the government (specifically the Reform Party) and Prime Minister Kristen Michal, who stands accused of lying and endangering national security. Criticism is aimed at both policy (a security failure) and procedures (lack of transparency, inadequate parliamentary notification). The attacks are intense and personal, even labeling other ministers (Terras, Pakosta, Sutt, Ligi) as unintelligent.

The main adversaries are "today's government" and the parliament, both of whom are being criticized over a specific vote. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of jeopardizing national security—an existential accusation.

The main adversary is the Reform Party government, which is accused of a complete failure in advancing national defense and fostering a sense of security among the Estonian people. The criticism is sharp and policy-based, focusing on the government's inability to ensure airspace control and transparency. There is no willingness to compromise, as the government's actions are considered a national disgrace.

The primary criticism is aimed at the government minister or ministry ("under your purview"), who stands accused of ignoring the risk of corruption and permitting wasteful spending within the defense sector. The criticism is intense, focusing on administrative failures, conflicts of interest, and funds vanishing into a "black hole."

The primary targets are Minister Joller and the Reform Party, who face fierce criticism for evading responsibility, displaying arrogant behavior, and practicing undemocratic intolerance. The attacks are intense and range from political failure (lack of funding for healthcare) to personal disqualification (anti-science stance, violation of allied relations). Compromise with the government is ruled out, as the speaker believes that almost all members of the government should face a vote of no confidence.

The main opponents are the Reform Party and members of the government (Pevkur, Taro, Ligi), who are accused of knowingly misleading the public and incompetence. The criticism is intense and ranges from political failure (national defense) to ethical accusations (lying, misappropriation of funds, and theft). The possibility of compromise is not mentioned; instead, accountability and the firing of officials and ministers are demanded.

The primary targets are the Reform Party and its ministers (Hanno Pevkur, Michal), who face accusations of incompetence, deceit, corruption, and jeopardizing national security. The criticism is intensely personal, labeling government members as "liars, thieves, and incompetent corrupt officials." There is no sign of willingness to compromise; instead, demands are being made for accountability and the immediate dismissal of the ministers.

The main opponents are the Riigikogu Presidium and the coalition parties, who are accused of violating the rules of procedure, restricting the rights of the opposition, and introducing "arbitrary rule." Criticism is also directed at specific ministers (Kallas, Svet, Alender) for their incompetence, lies, and spreading Kremlin talking points. There is no readiness for compromise, with the opposition stressing that if rules are absent, they will not adhere to them either.