By Plenary Sessions: Martin Helme

Insufficient data.

The style of cooperation is purely confrontational and uncompromising toward the government. The only indication of cooperation is inviting a colleague to pose a follow-up question, which suggests coordination within the faction.

Data is missing. The speaker's position is strongly oppositional and confrontational, which does not suggest any openness to compromise or cross-party cooperation regarding the issues addressed.

Insufficient data

There is not enough data.

There is too little data.

The speaker has demonstrated openness to compromise and pragmatism in the legislative process, having consulted with nearly all other parliamentary factions regarding the local elections bill. He recommends that the Riigikogu not reject the draft legislation but instead introduce the necessary amendments during the second reading to achieve the solution favored by the other factions (fixing the residency registration record).

Insufficient data.

There is no information about direct cooperation, readiness to compromise, or bipartisan support. Raimond Kaljulaid's stance on Pevkur's resignation is mentioned, suggesting shared criticism aimed at the government. The overall tone is confrontational and centered on blaming the government.

The cooperation primarily occurs within the opposition ranks, particularly when filing no-confidence motions, which include signatures from the Centre Party and unattached members of parliament. Communication with the coalition is characterized by a demanding and confrontational style, insisting that the rules be strictly followed. An offer of alliance is extended to the new government concerning tax cuts, but this is conditional and clearly politically motivated.