By Plenary Sessions: Martin Helme
Total Sessions: 126
Fully Profiled: 126
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
There is not enough data.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker refers back to previous cooperation within the government, specifically mentioning the failed attempt to reform the Planning Act due to internal opposition (Jaak Aab). The current approach, however, is entirely confrontational toward the government, emphasizing that the government is operating under special authorization rather than through genuine cooperation.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
There is no information regarding cooperation. The speaker is focusing on the government's responsibility and demanding clarification from them concerning the substance of the disagreements that have emerged with international partners (NATO Secretary General Rutte).
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
No data available
2025-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-09-24
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, press briefing
The style of cooperation is purely confrontational and uncompromising toward the government. The only indication of cooperation is inviting a colleague to pose a follow-up question, which suggests coordination within the faction.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Data is missing. The speaker's position is strongly oppositional and confrontational, which does not suggest any openness to compromise or cross-party cooperation regarding the issues addressed.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
Insufficient data
2025-09-17
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.
There is not enough data.
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
There is too little data.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The speaker has demonstrated openness to compromise and pragmatism in the legislative process, having consulted with nearly all other parliamentary factions regarding the local elections bill. He recommends that the Riigikogu not reject the draft legislation but instead introduce the necessary amendments during the second reading to achieve the solution favored by the other factions (fixing the residency registration record).
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing
Insufficient data.
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
There is no information about direct cooperation, readiness to compromise, or bipartisan support. Raimond Kaljulaid's stance on Pevkur's resignation is mentioned, suggesting shared criticism aimed at the government. The overall tone is confrontational and centered on blaming the government.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The cooperation primarily occurs within the opposition ranks, particularly when filing no-confidence motions, which include signatures from the Centre Party and unattached members of parliament. Communication with the coalition is characterized by a demanding and confrontational style, insisting that the rules be strictly followed. An offer of alliance is extended to the new government concerning tax cuts, but this is conditional and clearly politically motivated.
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker refers to cooperation within the opposition ("our opposition") and mentions colleague Reinsalu's questions regarding security analyses. There is no information concerning cross-party compromise or broad-based cooperation; the focus is on opposing the government.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Not enough data
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing.
There is no information regarding willingness to cooperate or compromise, as the speaker is engaged in a direct and sharp confrontation with the head of government. The style is demanding and accusatory, with the aim of forcing the prime minister to take a clear stance.
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
No data
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The speaker is showing support for their colleague Rene, pledging to definitely vote in favor of the bill. This indicates strong cooperation within the faction. There is absolutely no mention of cooperation or willingness to compromise with the governing parties, whom they consider incompetent.
2025-05-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing.
Willingness to cooperate is lacking; the address is purely confrontational, focusing on blaming the government and demanding its resignation. There are no references to cooperation with colleagues or other political parties.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
There is not enough data.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The speaker clearly represents the views of the opposition faction and emphasizes voting against the measure, demonstrating strong resistance to the coalition's actions. He demands that the coalition have a change of heart and amend the adopted laws, but offers no indication of willingness to cooperate or compromise with the governing parties.
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
There is not enough data.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is purely confrontational; the speaker positions themselves as the one exposing the government’s errors and holding them accountable. The only reference to "coming to the aid" of the coalition is an ironic proposal to repeal the security tax, which is used to test the coalition's right-wing credentials. No genuine willingness to compromise or engage in cross-party collaboration is evident in the speeches.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
Data is unavailable. The speaker refers to other faction members (Mart, Varro, Tõnis), which suggests internal faction unity, but there is no evidence of cooperation with other political parties.
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The speeches lack any reference to cooperation or willingness to compromise with other political parties. The focus is instead on the withdrawal of government partners and the collapse of the coalition, suggesting a rather isolationist or confrontational approach.
2025-04-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is too little data.
2025-04-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker demonstrates procedural courtesy by thanking Aivar Sõerd for the review of the committee's work, noting that the review was exceptionally good. The speaker also refers to earlier cooperation within their own parliamentary group concerning the repeated introduction of the bank tax bill. There is, however, no indication of a willingness to compromise with the governing coalition.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker emphasized the unified action of the opposition, highlighting that the opposition introduced six draft laws aimed at lowering taxes. There is no information regarding cooperation with the governing coalition or attempts to find a cross-party compromise.
2025-03-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is distinctly factional, given that the speaker is nominating the candidate on behalf of the faction of the Conservative People's Party of Estonia. There is no information available regarding cross-party cooperation or willingness to compromise.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is rather dominant and uncompromising; the speaker claims that EKRE's principled stance forced other parties (Isamaa, the Reform Party, the Social Democrats) to adopt their position. No direct willingness to compromise is expressed; instead, emphasis is placed on others submitting to the party's unwavering line.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The cooperation style is non-cooperative, as the speaker notes that their party has not been in government and likely won't do so with the Reform Party. There is a complete absence of any reference to a willingness to compromise or inter-party cooperation.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is insufficient data regarding the style of cooperation (such as willingness to compromise, forming coalitions, or cross-party collaboration) because the statements presented are purely oppositional and confrontational.
2025-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Talk of cooperation is primarily framed in a negative context, usually referencing the collective involvement in COVID-19 policy, including the party's own previous error back in 2020. The current debate lacks any openness to compromise, focusing instead on exposing a "conspiracy" and identifying the culprits.
2025-03-12
The 15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
Data regarding willingness to cooperate is lacking; conversely, it is emphasized that all policies, including foreign policy, must be open to debate in an open democratic state, and alternatives must be allowed to be proposed. No willingness to compromise with the government is apparent, as the government's political line has been declared bankrupt.
2025-02-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The collaborative style was evident among fellow faction members, who repeatedly asked questions regarding the names of businessmen, thereby presenting a united opposition front. There is no information available regarding the search for non-governmental or cross-party compromises.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is too little data.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is rigid and uncompromising, emphasizing the unified opposition of their faction to the draft bill. The Speaker sees no possibility for collaboration if the outcome involves undermining the constitution, and prefers the process to be halted or postponed until it is possible to ensure that voting rights remain exclusively reserved for Estonian citizens.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is insufficient data. All speeches focus on attacking and discrediting the government and its members, without mentioning cooperation or a willingness to compromise with other political forces.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
The style of cooperation is purely adversarial; speeches contain no references to collaboration, compromise, or bipartisan activity. The focus remains on sharply criticizing the government's actions and demanding the reversal of their policies.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is absolutely no indication of cooperation or willingness to compromise; the address is focused entirely on accusing the opposing side and demanding accountability.
2025-01-30
Fifteenth Estonian Parliament, fifth session, plenary session.
The speaker is attempting to influence their counterpart to support a specific amendment during the floor vote, ensuring the draft legislation proceeds to the final vote in the desired form. This indicates a readiness for procedural cooperation aimed at achieving the objective.
2025-01-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
There is no mention of cooperation with domestic political forces; rather, it is stressed that the government makes decisions unilaterally, disregarding the opinion of the Riigikogu and the public. International trends are highlighted as a model for cooperation, specifically where other countries are reassessing climate policy, suggesting that Estonia should join them.
2025-01-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker focuses on confrontation and disregarding the system, refusing to participate in the "pretense," which indicates a low willingness to cooperate. There are no references to cooperation with colleagues or other political parties.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The style of cooperation refers to intra-party political initiatives, citing the bank tax proposed last year by the Estonian Conservative People's Party (EKRE). There is no reference whatsoever to seeking compromises with the government coalition or to cross-party cooperation.
2024-12-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.
Lack of data
2024-12-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The speaker is attempting to rally the concerns of both his party and the broader Estonian public, stressing that the issue at hand involves widespread suspicion. He also suggests that other members of the Riigikogu share these same concerns, aiming to build broad-based opposition pressure against the government.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is strongly oppositional, but notes internal factional unity during voting (against most missions) and refers to Varro Vooglaid’s support regarding constitutional objections. The dispute held with the government is considered pointless and fruitless activity.
2024-12-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
Data is scarce.
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Information is unavailable. The speaker clearly operates within the opposition ranks, submitting motions for rejection and voting recommendations, but cross-party cooperation or willingness to compromise is entirely lacking.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker is demanding a search for compromise "across the board" (broader than just within the coalition) to secure the votes necessary for amending the constitution, setting this as a prerequisite for cooperation. At the same time, strong distrust is expressed, noting that the coalition began its search for compromise by ignoring the opposition.
2024-11-20
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing.
The speaker has collaborated with opposition factions, submitting an alternative draft constitutional amendment together with Isamaa and several non-affiliated members of parliament. He expresses a willingness to seek compromise, but strictly on the condition that voting rights for non-citizens are excluded from the constitution. The coalition is being asked to drop its arrogance if it wishes to secure votes.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
No desire for cooperation is expressed; the style is confrontational, focusing on defending the opposition's stance against the steamrolling of the government's agenda. The speaker emphasizes that the opposition's participation in the work of the Riigikogu only contributes to the coalition's pretense that democracy is actually functioning.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
Willingness to cooperate with the government is non-existent, as it is stressed that the Reform Party has obstructed political discussion. However, agreement is noted with the stance of another opposition politician (Helir-Valdor Seeder) regarding the criticism of replacement measures in regional policy.
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker opens by saying, "Thank you, Varro!" and proceeds to elaborate on a topic raised in Varro's presentation. This indicates collaboration or ideological support aimed at least one colleague. However, the overall style of the discussion remains largely confrontational and challenging.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The speaker urges other opposition parties to back the no-confidence vote against Ligi and criticizes the Social Democrats (whom they label as feminists) for their readiness to support Ligi, even after he insulted his female colleagues. The cooperation should focus on anti-government action and demanding political accountability.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The speaker frames the other parties (the Center Party, the Social Democrats, Isamaa) as victims of the government’s rhetoric, thus creating a common front of opposition. Direct cooperation or a readiness to compromise with the government is not mentioned; rather, the demands are for an apology and for accountability.
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Not enough data
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
No data.
2024-10-10
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth sitting, plenary session.
The speaker is acting along party lines, requesting a recess on behalf of the EKRE faction. During the substantive debate, he demonstrates strong opposition to the bill's initiators, focusing on highlighting their flaws, which does not indicate any willingness to compromise on the matter.
2024-10-09
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session.
There is too little data.
2024-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
Lack of data
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
Insufficient data. The speeches are purely confrontational and critical towards the government, and opportunities for cooperation are not mentioned.
2024-09-26
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
No data available
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
There is no willingness to cooperate, as the speaker’s position is purely confrontational and they demand the replacement of the government. There are no indications of cooperation with colleagues or other political parties, focusing instead on aggressively attacking the government’s policies.
2024-09-24
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
There is not enough data.
2024-09-23
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
There is insufficient data regarding the collaboration style.
2024-09-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
No data available.
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
There is absolutely no mention of cooperation, coalitions, or willingness to compromise; the speech is purely confrontational and critical of the system.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
No desire for cooperation or readiness for compromise with the government is mentioned; the focus is on a joint appeal by the Riigikogu to the government, which indicates a desire to mobilize the parliamentary majority against the government. There are no references to cross-party cooperation.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
Not enough data.
2024-09-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, press briefing.
No data available.
2024-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
The speaker is addressing the chamber on behalf of their faction, but demonstrates absolutely no willingness to compromise with the ruling parties, focusing instead on exposing their misdeeds. The style of interaction is purely confrontational, and the objective is to demonstrate that the governing coalition purchased a ministerial post to serve the interests of the Tallinn City Council.
2024-07-29
The 15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu.
The style of cooperation is future-oriented, signaling a readiness to join a new government (coalition) involving EKRE, specifically to abolish the car tax. There is no mention of current cooperation with other parties or a willingness to compromise on the issue at hand.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
Cooperation takes place within the faction, where a joint proposal is made to suspend the reading of the draft bill. The attitude toward the opposing side is confrontational, with protests raised against procedural decisions made in the committee, such as bundling proposals together. There is no apparent openness to compromise, as the content of the draft bill is deemed entirely unacceptable.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
Insufficient data.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The cooperation is aimed at representing the common interests of the opposition parties, with the promise that their candidate on the Riigikogu Board will represent all opposition parties. When nominating the candidate, it is emphasized that the deputy speaker position belongs to the largest opposition party. There is absolutely no sign of a willingness to compromise with the governing coalition.
2024-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speeches completely lack any reference to cooperation or willingness to compromise with the governing parties; instead, they represent a sharp confrontation. Cooperation is only mentioned indirectly, either by referring to colleagues (Aivar) or by addressing the chairman of the governing party to pose a question.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
The speeches are purely confrontational and focus on holding the government accountable. There are no references to cooperation, willingness to compromise, or bipartisan activity.
2024-05-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, information briefing
Insufficient data.
2024-05-28
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is visible internally within the faction, as demonstrated by the Estonian Conservative People's Party faction requesting a recess. There is a complete absence of any reference to cooperation with other parties or readiness to make compromises with the government.
2024-05-27
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
Insufficient data
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
They express support for the current draft bill aimed at strengthening the position of the Estonian language, demonstrating a willingness to back nationally significant legislation. However, they simultaneously call the goals of integration into question, suggesting a limited openness to compromise on broader socio-political matters.
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient data. (The communication is purely confrontational and does not indicate cooperation or a willingness to compromise.)
2024-05-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker is collaborating with Center Party MPs, initiating a Riigikogu draft resolution to appeal to the Venice Commission for an international assessment of electoral integrity. However, the overall communication style remains confrontational, urging coalition MPs to support the critics' initiatives to dispel doubts regarding the system's integrity.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Insufficient data.
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The address demonstrates cooperation between the opposition factions, as the motion of no confidence was submitted by members of the Estonian Conservative People's Party faction and the Estonian Centre Party faction. There is a complete absence of any reference to a willingness to cooperate or compromise with the government or the minister, instead emphasizing the minister's inability to prevent the strike and resolve the crises.
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
A collaborative approach is evident within the opposition, supporting Kalle Grünthal’s earlier inquiry and submitting procedural motions. He points to the voting proposal put forward by three factions and the request for a recess made by two factions, demonstrating a willingness for cross-factional collaboration concerning the organization of parliamentary work.
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient Data
2024-04-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Not enough data.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is evident internally within the faction (the EKRE faction), where obstructionist measures (requesting recesses) are coordinated and voting freedom is mentioned. There are no indications of collaboration with other factions or a willingness to compromise; the focus is on intense opposition.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The style of cooperation is clearly intra-factional, as the speaker represents the collective position of the EKRE faction. There is no evidence of openness to compromise or cross-party cooperation.
2024-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
Lack of data
2024-04-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker emphasizes the need to represent the interests of the opposition with dignity in the Riigikogu Board, citing the right of the largest opposition party to this position. Cooperation with other factions is not mentioned, but adherence to historical parliamentary custom is emphasized.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Details are scarce. The speaker is operating strictly within the framework of the opposition faction (EKRE), demanding accountability from the government and the justice system, but shows no indication of cooperation or willingness to compromise with the ruling coalition.
2024-04-01
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Cooperation is restricted solely to supporting their own party or their benchmate Varro Vooglaid and agreeing with his views. There is no indication whatsoever of openness to compromise or inter-party cooperation, given that the government's activities are considered inherently undemocratic and reversible.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2024-03-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Data is scarce.
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
In the current context, the style is confrontational, but the speaker is offering the government a "helping hand" with his proposal to improve the situation. Previously, successful cooperation with market participants (producers, distributors) was emphasized in order to realize the impact of tax cuts. There is no reference to current cross-party cooperation.
2024-03-13
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
Not enough data
2024-03-12
15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting
No data available
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
No data available.
2024-03-07
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third sitting, plenary session
Cooperation is lacking, especially concerning climate policy, where any societal agreement to raise consumer prices is rejected. The speaker positions themselves as the only "sane person in the madhouse," which points to strong isolation and confrontation.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker shows no willingness to cooperate with the ruling parties, deeming their policies criminal. He criticizes the Reform Party’s “arrogance” in needing EKRE’s votes to restrict suffrage, stressing that meaningful cooperation necessitates an agreement on a comprehensive citizen-based solution.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Communication with Chairman Jüri Kesküla is direct and procedural, including both agreement ("Correct, Jüri") and requests not to interrupt. He shows a readiness for substantive discussion, referencing the multifaceted debate that took place in the committee. The focus of the session is more on demanding answers than on seeking compromises.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The data is insufficient. The statements are purely oppositional and critical of the government; there is no mention of a willingness to cooperate or seeking compromises.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker is focused on defending previous achievements and disputing the arguments of opponents, which suggests that relationships are currently dominated by confrontation. Negotiations within the European Union concerning the CAP are mentioned, indicating a history of international cooperation. There is no information available regarding current compromise or cooperation between the political parties.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Not enough data
2024-02-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2024-02-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
Not enough data
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
The style of cooperation is confrontational, and there is no indication of a willingness to compromise or engage in cross-party collaboration. He/She refers to cooperation with members of his/her faction (Anti and Evelin Poolamets) regarding the activities of the NGO "Ukraina Eest" (For Ukraine). The speaker sharply criticizes the Riigikogu Board for violating the law during the processing of draft legislation.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The speaker points to the reluctant cooperation seen in the previous coalition regarding the support for Nordica, observing that compromises are necessary within a coalition. In the current context, however, his style is entirely confrontational, demanding that the government take responsibility and accusing them of breaking the law.
2024-01-25
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker demonstrates a willingness to cooperate by supporting the content of the bill and referencing their agreement with the previous question ("the same question"), which suggests a constructive approach to the legislative process.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker addresses "Dear colleagues" directly, requesting support for the draft bill, which demonstrates a desire to achieve parliamentary consensus for the bill's passage. The cooperative style is exploratory and entreating.
2024-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Information is missing regarding current cooperation with other political parties. Initiatives of the previous government (involving EKRE) are mentioned, such as the funding of the Mäo section and the study of PPP models for infrastructure projects.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The style of cooperation is aimed at supporting bills initiated by fellow party members, emphasizing that these are initiatives of individual Riigikogu members (e.g., Martin Helme and Rain Epler), not bills proposed by the parliamentary group. He/She acknowledges that other colleagues have not supported the bills he/she proposed, but promises to continue making proposals.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Insufficient data.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
Lack of data
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Although criticizing the Reform Party overall, the speaker recognizes Urve Tiidus as one of the "more reasonable people" in the faction, referencing their previous cooperation spanning three terms. Generally, there is a lack of willingness to compromise with the government; instead, the focus is placed on highlighting the opposing side's errors.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Cooperation is taking place within the faction, for which he is requesting a recess for consultation. He criticizes the inability of the government and the coalition to support the draft legislation he has submitted, noting that support cannot be found even when there are several good options available. There are no indications of a willingness to compromise with the government.