By Plenary Sessions: Martin Helme

The main opponent is the Reform Party-led government, specifically Kristen Michal and Kaja Kallas, who stand accused of a radical divergence between their words and deeds, and outright hypocrisy regarding state borrowing. The criticism is intense, centering on political failure (the economic recession) and corruption (a reference to "crony business" in the defense industry). The government's policies are utterly condemned.

The main adversary is Ms. Pakosta, who is being accused of brazen lying and crude demagoguery directed at the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament). The criticism is intense, personal, and ideological, aimed squarely at "progressives" and "left-wing radicals." The speaker completely rejects any support for the topic under discussion, deeming it an "extreme matter."

The main opponent is the Reform Party and the government it leads, which is accused of screwing up the nation's affairs and doubling the debt burden. The criticism is intense and covers both economic policy failure and personal incompetence (they are speaking with a "forked tongue"). No willingness to compromise is shown; instead, they demand the government resign and make way for "someone who understands."

The main opponent is the "liberal regime" and its representatives (ministers), who are accused of destroying the economy and driving the country into its deepest recession. The criticism is intense, combining political failure with a personal contrast (the size of their salaries versus the general cost of living).

The primary confrontation is directed against the current government, which is being criticized for wasteful spending and unjustified austerity decisions (specifically, the closure of the consulate general). The criticism is both policy-based and procedural, accusing the government of ramming decisions through and demonstrating a complete unwillingness to compromise.

The primary opposition is directed at those pushing the narrative that renewable energy is clean and cheap, often citing the unrealistic promises made by the government or economic planners. The criticism is fierce and centers on the financial injustice of the policy, which burdens the Estonian populace through soaring prices and tax hikes.

The main adversaries are the government and the Reform Party, who are being accused of economic destruction and corruption. The criticism is intense, ranging from policy issues (tax hikes, the green transition) to ethical accusations (legalized corruption, bias within the prosecution service). The speaker suspects that the 160 million euro support measure is specifically aimed at a businessman closely associated with the Reform Party.

The main opponents are the "liberal globalist regime" and its inner circle/cabal, including the Chancellor of Justice, the President, the government, and the parliamentary majority. The criticism is intense, ideological, and accusatory, labeling the opponents as "prohibitors, commanders, destroyers of society," and tramplers of the law. The attacks target policy (the green transition, asset confiscation), procedure (the abolition of obstruction/filibustering), and personal matters (a reference to a pedophilia case and political persecution).

The primary opponent is the government and political forces, who are being criticized both for their policies (cutting benefits) and their ideological position (the mocking of mothers). The criticism is highly intense and includes accusations of jeopardizing national security by permitting uncontrolled immigration. The opposition is absolute, and no compromise is being offered; instead, they are demanding a complete reversal of the government's direction.

The main opponent is the Reform Party and Kaja Kallas’s governments, who stand accused of undermining national defense, depleting ammunition and weapons stocks, and actively disinforming the public. The criticism leveled against them is both political (poor decision-making) and ethical (misappropriation of funds, subsidizing the American military-industrial complex). The speaker expresses total dissatisfaction and rules out any possibility of endorsing the government’s actions.

The main opponents are the government (the continuing administration of Kristen Michal and Kaja Kallas) and Minister of the Interior Läänemets. The criticism is intense, accusing the opponents of violating the constitution, abusing power, and enforcing the Russian historical narrative. The confrontation is absolute, accusing the government of practicing incessant lying and unequal treatment (the Bronze Soldier case versus the Lihula incident).

The primary opponent is the Reform Party-led government and its ministers (Kristen Michal, Kaja Kallas, Vladimir Svet, Lauri Läänemets, Kristina Kallas). The criticism is intense and ranges from political failures (education, immigration) to personal and ideological attacks (Estophobia, honoring the Bronze Soldier, overriding legislation). Opponents are branded as "Russifiers" and "the regime," ruling out compromise.