By Plenary Sessions: Martin Helme

The main opponents are the governing coalition, referred to as "liberals or socialists," and the relevant minister, who is nicknamed the "tanker." The criticism is intense and focuses on the government’s immoral conduct, the breaking of election promises, and the deception of voters. The speaker offers no compromise, instead demanding accountability and exposing alleged falsehoods.

The main opponents are the government (which is labeled as the most anti-family and anti-child government in Estonian history), the European Central Bank (which is accused of enforcing an ideological agenda and a catastrophic monetary policy failure), and the proponents of the green and woke agendas. The criticism is intense, ideological, and precludes compromise, labeling the opponents' positions as "radical feminist slogans."

The main opponents are "liberals" and Kaja Kallas's government, who are accused of driving the country toward bankruptcy and implementing "green terror." The criticism is intense and ideological, labeling the opponents' plans as "ultra-communist" and aimed at the enslavement of a free society. The opponents' policies are viewed as anti-scientific and anti-rational.

The primary adversaries are the governing coalition (dubbed the "liberal regime"), the Riigikogu (Parliament) Board, and its committees, all of whom are accused of systematically violating rules and stripping the opposition of its rights. The criticism is primarily procedural and systemic, arguing that the coalition no longer feels obligated to consider the opposition or seek compromises. Furthermore, the speaker accuses "liberal activists" within the Supreme Court of providing political cover for these legal violations.

There is no direct criticism or naming of adversaries. The action is rather a procedural objection to the rapid advancement of the session, pointing toward a tactical confrontation.

The opposition’s stance is directed against both the executive branch (the minister) and the governing bodies of the Riigikogu (the board/presidium). The criticism is primarily procedural, accusing them of violating the constitution and the rules of procedure due to their failure to respond to an interpellation. Additionally, the inefficiency of government expenditures is also being criticized.

The opposition's stance is directed against last year's election of the Riigikogu board, which is considered a procedural failure. The criticism targets the violation of institutional practice, not the individuals involved, and the objective is to ensure the dignified representation of the opposition's interests.

The opposition's stance is intense and aimed squarely at the ruling coalition, the liberals, and the Prosecutor's Office, who are accused of abusing power and conducting a political "witch hunt" against opposition politicians. The criticism is both political and procedural, alleging that the system employs double standards and corruption, and drawing comparisons between Estonia and authoritarian states.

The main opponents are the Reform Party and Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, who are accused of lying, cultural Marxism, and undemocratic practices. Strong criticism is also directed at the Social Democrats and Minister of the Interior Lauri Läänemets, who are accused of justifying the abuse of power by security agencies and sliding into a totalitarian pattern. The criticism is predominantly value-based and personal, calling into question the moral and democratic legitimacy of the opponents.