By Plenary Sessions: Martin Helme

A collaborative approach is evident within the opposition, supporting Kalle Grünthal’s earlier inquiry and submitting procedural motions. He points to the voting proposal put forward by three factions and the request for a recess made by two factions, demonstrating a willingness for cross-factional collaboration concerning the organization of parliamentary work.

Insufficient Data

Not enough data.

The style of cooperation is evident internally within the faction (the EKRE faction), where obstructionist measures (requesting recesses) are coordinated and voting freedom is mentioned. There are no indications of collaboration with other factions or a willingness to compromise; the focus is on intense opposition.

The style of cooperation is clearly intra-factional, as the speaker represents the collective position of the EKRE faction. There is no evidence of openness to compromise or cross-party cooperation.

Lack of data

The speaker emphasizes the need to represent the interests of the opposition with dignity in the Riigikogu Board, citing the right of the largest opposition party to this position. Cooperation with other factions is not mentioned, but adherence to historical parliamentary custom is emphasized.

Details are scarce. The speaker is operating strictly within the framework of the opposition faction (EKRE), demanding accountability from the government and the justice system, but shows no indication of cooperation or willingness to compromise with the ruling coalition.

Cooperation is restricted solely to supporting their own party or their benchmate Varro Vooglaid and agreeing with his views. There is no indication whatsoever of openness to compromise or inter-party cooperation, given that the government's activities are considered inherently undemocratic and reversible.