By Plenary Sessions: Martin Helme

The speaker is active during the plenary session, engaging in a heated debate with the minister and repeatedly raising questions regarding the government's broken promises. Beyond participating in the substantive discussion, he/she also addresses procedural matters, supporting other factions' requests for recesses and votes.

The speaker actively participates in the plenary session debates, posing questions as well as delivering longer presentations, and manages procedural time allocation ("to rent eight minutes"). All their contributions focus either on criticizing economic policy and the green agenda or attacking the government's social policy.

Not enough data.

In the plenary session, the member is highly active, repeatedly engaging in procedural debates and posing questions. He systematically employs delaying tactics, repeatedly calling for 10-minute recesses for parliamentary groups before votes. This demonstrates a clear focus on obstructing the work of the Riigikogu and exploiting the procedural rules to the maximum extent possible.

The speaker is active during the plenary session, presenting procedural requests on behalf of the faction. This demonstrates participation in the daily work of the parliament and the representation of the faction's tactical needs.

The speaker is active during the plenary session, posing oral questions regarding both violations of procedural order and the expediency of state investments. His/Her pattern of activity involves holding the government and the Riigikogu Board accountable.

Insufficient data.

The speaker is active during plenary sessions, repeatedly posing sharp questions and issuing statements regarding the actions of the government and the judicial system. They actively participate in faction-based voting, urging others to vote in favor of the EKRE faction.

The speaker was highly active during the plenary session, delivering multiple lengthy speeches and posing questions on various topics, even utilizing the extended speaking time (eight minutes). All the speeches are dated to the same day, suggesting intense involvement in specific debates (redefining marriage, immigration, and police activity).