By Plenary Sessions: Mart Helme

Sharp opposition is mounted against the government and the coalition, particularly the Social Democrats and the administration led by Kaja Kallas, accusing them of financial chaos and flawed economic and energy policies. The criticism is both policy-based and procedural, accusing the coalition of forcing the opposition to support bills that offer only minimal relief. Compromise is ruled out, although it is acknowledged that the opposition is forced to support the "handing out of crumbs" to avoid attacks from propagandists.

The confrontation is highly intense and targets both the procedural arbitrariness of the Riigikogu Speaker and the personal conduct and competence of the Prime Minister (Kaja Kallas). The Prime Minister is sharply criticized for "stupidity" and disregarding the rules, with critics asserting that the government is trampling on laws, oversight mechanisms, and international regulations. The criticism is thus procedural, political, and personal.

The opposition is aimed at the government and the Minister of Social Protection, who face sharp criticism for their lack of empathy, bureaucratic responses, and avoidance of political responsibility. The attacks are intense and include accusations of corruption (linking e-voting abuses to the owners of the Reform Party) and the government wasting money on "red and liberal campaigns."

The primary opponent is the Reform Party, which is being criticized on personal and ethical grounds, and outright labeled as criminal. The intensity of the attack is maximal, demanding the complete removal of the opposing party from the Riigikogu chamber.

The main opponent is Interior Minister Lauri Läänemets, who is being criticized for avoiding responsibility regarding the activities of institutions under his authority. The criticism is intense and includes accusations of inadequate situation assessment and an attempt at "brainwashing," thereby casting doubt on the minister's conclusions concerning the activities of Russian special services.

The opposition is directed against the actions of the government or the majority, sharply criticizing procedural violations and unlawfulness. The criticism is procedural and intense, declaring the adoption of the bill to be illegal, which precludes any compromise regarding the legitimacy of the results. The speaker threatens the future repeal of the bill, demonstrating the long-term nature of this opposition.

The opposition's stance is aimed squarely at the government, the minister, and the prime minister, criticizing their inaction and their failure to take responsibility. The criticism is intense, focusing on failed projects and the political entrenchment that makes resignation impossible. The speaker suspects the government of pursuing hidden agendas (bilingualism).