By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal

Not enough data. In the statements in question, the speaker focuses on criticizing and challenging the opposing side, rather than seeking cooperation or compromises. There are no references to cooperation with colleagues or other factions.

The speaker proposes, as a form of cooperation, the mutual organization of non-attached members through the creation of a new faction. This is a pragmatic proposal for collaboration toward a common goal: to open up the opportunity for them to take part in the parliamentary debate.

Insufficient data.

The speaker referenced cooperation within the opposition, noting that representatives from both EKRE and Isamaa have submitted constructive proposals. However, it is stressed that cooperation with the ruling coalition is impossible, as the government merely laughs at their suggestions. Broad-based cooperation between trade unions and employers is supported for the purpose of organizing a general strike.

There is not enough data.

Information regarding the cooperation style is unavailable; the speaker focuses on opposing the draft bill and accusing the opposing side of dishonesty and the betrayal of national interests. No willingness to compromise is evident, as the speech concludes with a proposal to suspend the reading.

The speaker strongly supports the draft resolution presented by Varro Vooglaid, praising its presentation as "exquisite" and giving it the highest possible mark. He also refers supportively to the statements made by his colleague Urmas Kruuse. There is no direct indication of a willingness to compromise with the opposition; rather, the shortcomings of the opponents are emphasized.

Even though the speaker is an opposition member, he stresses the necessity of cross-party cooperation, particularly when investigating the circumstances surrounding Rail Baltic. He proposes a pragmatic solution (a support group) that would allow the dirty work to be done and materials to be gathered even if the official investigative commission fails.

Insufficient data. The speaker's focus is on sharply criticizing opponents and demanding answers from them, rather than seeking cooperation or compromise.

There is no evidence of cooperation, willingness to compromise, or the seeking of cross-party support. The speaker's position is purely critical and aimed at challenging the actions of the government and parliamentary committees.