By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal

Data shows intense activity during one plenary session day (November 20, 2024), where the speaker repeatedly raised questions and points of order. He/She actively intervened in the discussion regarding both the substance of the bill and the voting procedures, emphasizing his/her views through several brief interventions.

There is not enough data.

The pattern of action centers on legislative initiative, serving as the proponent and advocate for the draft amendment to the Penal Code (KarS) within the Riigikogu chamber. He/She has undertaken explanatory work related to the incidents, citing the bill's explanatory memorandum and previous questions posed to the Minister of the Interior.

The data indicates active participation in the Riigikogu plenary session during the state budget debate, including the presentation of both procedural questions and a longer political statement. Other activity patterns (such as meetings, travel, or regular public appearances) are not evident from the submitted texts.

There is not enough data.

The pattern of activity involves active participation in plenary discussions, posing repeated and detailed questions to the rapporteur regarding the content of the draft law. The speaker emphasizes having thoroughly read the bill ("damn it, I actually took the trouble to read the bill") and demands additional time to present their views.

The speaker was active during the November 2024 plenary session, raising several questions and procedural remarks. They referenced prior participation in the discussions of the Social Affairs Committee regarding the same draft bill, which demonstrates consistent involvement in certain legislative processes.

All speeches were delivered during a single plenary session, demonstrating active involvement in discussions concerning current affairs. He/She also references his/her long-standing and influential work as the chairman of the support group investigating the sinking of the M/S Estonia, which suggests persistent engagement even outside of standard legislative processes.

The speaker is active during the plenary session, asking several questions and making comments on the same day, which points to regular participation in parliamentary debates and sharp criticism of the government's actions. This pattern of activity demonstrates a focus on urgent legislative and oversight matters.

The speaker is an active questioner during the plenary session, posing several pointed questions to various presenters in quick succession. Their pattern of activity indicates a focus on debates and the raising of procedural issues.