By Plenary Sessions: Varro Vooglaid

The speaker demonstrates profound expertise in constitutional law (referencing Sections 3 and 128) and data protection, emphasizing the principle of data minimization in collection. They utilize detailed knowledge of the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act to effectively refute arguments concerning urgency. Furthermore, they are well-versed in the technical and legal specifics of the PPA license plate recognition camera system.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in state finance and the national debt burden, asking detailed questions regarding the size of loan interest payments, both currently (based on 2 billion) and as projected for 2030. He/She specifically references the 2023 election platform and the coalition agreement, indicating familiarity with these documents. The expertise is clearly economic and fiscal-political.

Expertise is evident in the details of legislation, particularly concerning the need to limit discretionary power and qualify evidence within the law itself, rather than only in the explanatory memorandum. Technical terms are used, such as "Population Register" and "healthcare service provider," and examples of alternative evidence are provided (DNA test, ambulance record, witness statements).

The speaker demonstrates detailed knowledge regarding the maritime security operation, utilizing specific names (AW139, tanker Jaguar/Argent) and technical terminology (boarding, escort). To support these arguments, the assessment provided by former Navy Commander Jüri Saska is used to challenge the Prime Minister's official narrative. Furthermore, the regulatory aspects of crisis preparedness concerning internal security personnel (PPA) and prisons are also discussed.

The speaker demonstrates a thorough knowledge of the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia, citing specific sections (§ 40, § 44, § 130) and legal concepts. He participated in a specific legal discussion regarding the restriction of religious freedom with Hent-Raul Kalmo, the President's legal advisor. He emphasizes the fundamental nature of the freedom of religious associations against interference by state authority.

The speaker demonstrates awareness of security incidents, specifically referencing the Võrtsjärv drone incident and previous Ukrainian attacks within Russia. They employ technical terminology such as "flight trajectory" and "strike drone," focusing on the details of the incident investigation (launch location, entry into airspace). It is emphasized that these matters should have been fully investigated and clarified over the past few weeks.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the field of constitutional law and institutional responsibility, specifically referencing Article 3 of the Constitution. The expertise also stems from practical experience as a member of the Riigikogu and specifically as a member of the Legal Affairs Committee. Technical terms such as "rule of law" and "competence" are utilized.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the field of National Audit Office audits and financial management oversight, precisely citing issues concerning document accessibility, defense aid contracts, and the quantities and cost of recorded inventory. The expertise focuses on organizational disarray and substantive deficiencies that run deeper than mere accounting problems.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of healthcare policy and vaccines, employing terms such as "mRNA technology," "safety studies," and "spreaders of pseudoscience." He/She presents objections to the minister's claims regarding vaccine safety and efficacy, citing the lack of a scientific basis. Furthermore, he/she possesses a strict understanding of the Riigikogu's procedural rules, specifically addressing the right to use the podium and the right to withdraw a question.

The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the management of national defense, the oversight of fund usage, and the audits conducted by the National Audit Office, pointing to systemic disarray. Their expertise is particularly strong in the field of constitutional law and financial regulation, where they emphasize the principle of proportionality and the legal basis for restricting rights in the context of the activities of savings and loan associations.

The speaker demonstrates a high level of expertise in the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules Act and constitutional law, frequently citing specific sections (e.g., § 95, § 103, § 128) and challenging the interpretations put forth by the Presidium. They exhibit a thorough understanding of the technical details involved in initiating legislation, particularly concerning the majority requirements needed for the adoption of bills. Furthermore, they are familiar with the Chancellor of Justice's prior positions regarding the right to life.