By Plenary Sessions: Varro Vooglaid

The speaker is highly active during the Riigikogu plenary session, addressing multiple agenda items both on behalf of their parliamentary group and in a personal capacity. They are a consistent opponent, noting that they presented the same arguments during the handling of similar draft legislation in previous years as well (2023, 2024). Furthermore, they have taken personal measures (a data query directed to the PPA) to support their legislative work.

Lack of data

Data is scarce.

The speaker is actively participating in the Riigikogu plenary session, submitting inquiries and clarifying questions aimed at uncovering details the government has failed to address. This pattern of activity demonstrates a commitment to holding the government accountable for specific operations and decisions.

The speaker is highly active during the plenary session, repeatedly addressing questions to the chairs of both the Constitutional Committee and the Finance Committee, and delivering lengthy and substantive addresses. This pattern of activity suggests a focus on procedural and substantive flaws in the legislative process, particularly concerning laws that the President has refused to promulgate.

The speaker is participating in the Riigikogu Q&A session, asking repeated and clarifying questions regarding the recent security incident. The pattern of activity indicates a rapid response to changes in the security situation and a demanding approach toward the government's actions. Data concerning other activities is unavailable.

The speaker is active in the plenary sessions of the Riigikogu, submitting questions and communicating directly with the Chancellor of Justice. Their activity patterns indicate a specialization in lawmaking, having served as a member of the Legal Affairs Committee.

According to the data, this is a question presented during a plenary session, which is linked to a topic raised by a previous colleague, specifically referring to the rhythm of questioning during parliamentary sittings.

The speaker was active during the plenary session, raising several substantive and procedural questions during the debate on the motion of no confidence. They participated intensely in the debate, requesting repetition because a substantive answer had not been recorded. All appearances were concentrated on a single day.

The speaker was active in the plenary session, consecutively addressing questions to both the Minister and the representative of the Commission, with a focus on accountability and the quality of legislation. All appearances took place during the course of a single session day.

The member is highly active in Riigikogu sittings, regularly submitting formal inquiries to the Prime Minister and other ministers, and initiating draft legislation. Their pattern of activity includes repeatedly challenging and demanding clarification regarding the procedural decisions made by the board and committees, especially concerning the rights of the opposition. They actively participate in information hours and the submission of bills.