By Plenary Sessions: Varro Vooglaid

The political position is strongly opposed to the draft bill concerning the doubling of fine rates. The stance is primarily substantive and procedural, criticizing the government's alleged incompetence and its attempt to cover the state budget deficit through new taxes and levies. It is emphasized that the true purpose of the bill is to fill the state treasury, not to cover procedural costs, as claimed.

The political stance is strongly opposed to the government’s policies regarding both the European Union’s climate measures and abortion policy. Climate policy is criticized for being overly ideological and inefficient, drawing comparisons to the mechanisms of the Soviet Union. The primary focus is value-based, stressing the constitutional right to life and the state’s duty to protect unborn children. The speaker demands legal and moral consistency from the government in upholding constitutional ideals.

The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on the rules of procedure of the Riigikogu and the trustworthiness of the electoral system. The speaker sharply criticizes the practice of bundling amendment proposals and asserts that public trust in the internet voting system is extremely low (around 40%). The stances taken are highly procedural and value-based, emphasizing adherence to the principles of the rule of law and logic in the legislative process.

The political focus is on national security and constitutional propriety, especially concerning the potential deployment of the Defense Forces to Ukraine without a mandate from the Riigikogu (Parliament). He/She expresses strong concern that such an action could lead the Republic of Estonia into military hostilities with Russia. Furthermore, he/she emphasizes the need for transparency in the negotiations of international treaties (the WHO pandemic treaty), criticizing the closed nature of the process.

The political focus is heavily centered on national defense and the transparency of government operations, particularly regarding the potential deployment of Estonian defense forces personnel to Ukraine. The speaker adopts a strong oppositional position, demanding a clear answer from the Prime Minister and emphasizing the constitutional order, which mandates that the Riigikogu (Parliament) must approve foreign missions and treaties involving military commitments. The overall framework is highly procedural and value-driven, concentrating on safeguarding the rights of the Riigikogu.

The political position is strongly value-driven and conservative, focusing on the protection of children and families, and the preservation of the nation-state. The speaker sharply criticizes the government's cuts to family policy and the participation of Estonian diplomats in ideological activism abroad (Hungary), deeming this unacceptable interference in internal affairs. These positions are framed by constitutional obligations (the survival of the nation, special care for large families) and moral convictions. The homo- and gender-ideological agenda is particularly strongly opposed.

The political focus is on the principles of the rule of law, particularly the creation of a system to ensure effective oversight and accountability of the Prosecutor's Office. The speaker strongly emphasizes that the identification of violations must be followed by sanctions, not merely the documentation of the violation. Furthermore, he/she criticizes the coalition's previous actions, which violated the working environment of the Legal Affairs Committee by brazenly pushing through the so-called value-based law (the project concerning the perversion of marriage).

The political focus is on national defense and parliamentary oversight of the government's activities. The speaker expresses strong concern regarding the potential participation of active servicemen or reservists of the Estonian Defence Forces in tasks related to military operations in Ukraine, demanding a concrete answer from the government. The criticism is aimed at the government's alleged overstepping of its authority, referring to Riigikogu decision 317 as a "blank check."

The political stance is fiercely anti-government and values-driven, centering on the defense of traditional marriage and sharp criticism of mass immigration. The speaker highlights the undermining of the state's foundations and the protection of constitutional liberties (the right to demonstrate) against unlawful police intervention. Furthermore, he accuses the government of disregarding the will of the electorate and polarizing society.