By Plenary Sessions: Varro Vooglaid

Critical of the government's fiscal policy, which is characterized by a "runaway deficit" and the systematic raising of taxes, excise duties, and fees following the elections. It opposes the increase in fine rates as an unfair method for replenishing the state treasury, suspecting that the true objective is plugging budget holes.

Economic views are characterized by skepticism regarding the implementation of the European Union's climate policy, criticizing the deployment of ideological mechanisms and questioning their actual impact. A separate point of emphasis is the question of whether banks should be implementing measures whose actual necessity has not been proven.

There is not enough data.

Insufficient data

The economic considerations relate solely to the potential financial commitment stemming from the Estonia-Ukraine security agreement (allegedly 0.25% of GDP over a 10-year period). This commitment is set forth in a context that necessitates ratification by the Riigikogu, underscoring both fiscal and asset-related accountability.

Economic views focus on supporting families, sharply criticizing the abolition of the income tax exemption for children (180 million euros). Support is given to finding alternative funding sources, citing as an example the introduction of a bank tax following the Lithuanian model (150 million euros per year). The government cuts are considered to be inconsistent with family-friendly policy.

Data unavailable

Insufficient information.

Not enough data